Intentionality from structure: a non-relational account of the constitution of phenomenal intentionality
dc.contributor.advisor
Isaac, Alistair
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Kallestrup, Jesper
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Rupert, Robert
en
dc.contributor.author
Kenneally, Blaine Gordon John
en
dc.contributor.sponsor
Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)
en
dc.date.accessioned
2019-07-12T10:28:13Z
dc.date.available
2019-07-12T10:28:13Z
dc.date.issued
2019-07-02
dc.description.abstract
In recent decades, there has been a growth in the popularity of the view that
there is a form of intentionality which is grounded in phenomenal consciousness.
Some philosophers have argued that this form of intentionality is non-relational in
nature. In this thesis, I consider what phenomenal conditions might ground a non-relational
form of intentionality. I argue that this non-relational phenomenal
intentionality is constituted by the structural organisation of phenomenal qualities.
In Part I, I consider the mistakes we are prone to, and should avoid, when it
comes to theorising about phenomenally conscious experience. I show that, in the
debate over the ‘transparency’ of experience, disputants have overlooked the crucial
distinction between metaphysics and phenomenology, which we should take care to
respect. I then show that disputants have also conflated two different sorts of
'seeming', and as such have made a mistake about what is 'given' to us in experience.
I explain in detail why we are susceptible to mistakes about what is 'given', in order
that we might take steps to avoid them.
With the avoidance of these errors in mind, in Part II I assess six suggestions
as to what phenomenal conditions are constitutive of phenomenal intentionality. I
identify, as a promising candidate, the suggestion that phenomenal intentionality is
constituted by the structural organisation of more basic phenomenal elements. I then
consider in more depth how mistakes about what is 'given' might be made in relation
to phenomenal intentionality. I argue that the structural organisation account carries
minimal risk of such errors, given that it commits only to phenomenological claims
which are broadly agreed upon.
In Part III, I flesh out the structural organisation account, articulating my own
more detailed theory as to how non-intentional elements of phenomenal character—
phenomenal qualities—come to constitute phenomenal intentionality when
structurally organised in the appropriate way.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/35748
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
phenomenology
en
dc.subject
aboutness
en
dc.subject
consciousness
en
dc.subject
representationalism
en
dc.subject
depiction
en
dc.subject
spatiotemporal
en
dc.subject
qualia debate
en
dc.title
Intentionality from structure: a non-relational account of the constitution of phenomenal intentionality
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Kenneally2019.pdf
- Size:
- 1.46 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

