Attachment and amae: a comparative study of mother-child close relationships in Japan and Britain
dc.contributor.advisor
Wishart, Jennifer
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Cebula, Katie
en
dc.contributor.author
Komatsu, Kaori
en
dc.contributor.sponsor
University of Edinburgh
en
dc.contributor.sponsor
British Council Japan Association Scholarship
en
dc.contributor.sponsor
Hitachi Family Research Support Fund grant
en
dc.contributor.sponsor
Godfrey Thomson PhD Research Support Fund
en
dc.date.accessioned
2012-07-25T09:37:49Z
dc.date.available
2012-07-25T09:37:49Z
dc.date.issued
2011-11-24
dc.description.abstract
Attachment theory addresses the young child’s biological and psychological need to
elicit their mother’s protection and care, and seeks to explain the emotional bond that
forms between them in the early years of life. Several researchers have pointed out
that the Western concept of attachment might be less relevant for Japanese
parent-child dyads because Japanese child-rearing ideals are based on the concept of
‘amae’ (emotional one-ness between mother and child), whereas attachment theory
emphasises the link between attachment and independence/autonomy.
Research to
date, however, has not yet directly addressed the possible association between
maternal amae attitudes and attachment patterns in Japanese mother-child dyads.
This is, in part, due to the current lack of any assessment tool to measure mothers’
responses to their child’s amae behaviours. Japanese attachment patterns have also
not yet been investigated using the Manchester Child Attachment Story Task
(MCAST: Green et al., 2000), a doll-play attachment measurement for children aged
between 4 and 8 years old which has been used in Western contexts.
This doctoral thesis consists of three cross-cultural empirical studies which address
this gap in the current literature. In the first study, a 39-item prototype amae attitude
scale (AAS) was constructed based on responses from Japanese focus groups and an
earlier study of amae behaviours (Vereijken et al., 1997). The scale was subsequently
completed by Japanese and British mothers. Japanese mothers were found to be more
tolerant in general than British mothers of their child’s amae behaviours, in all 4
sub-categories explored (pure, asking, frustrated, and anxious amae), with cultural
differences most marked in maternal attitudes towards their children’s anxious-amae
behaviour.
The second study addressed two questions: whether attachment behaviours differ in
Japanese and British 4-5 year olds (measured with the MCAST) and whether there is
a relationship between children’s MCAST attachment classifications and maternal
attitudes towards children’s amae behaviours (measured with the AAS) in Japanese
and British dyads. Contrary to what has been found in some of the previous Japanese
Strange Situation studies, the distribution of MCAST attachment classifications was
similar in the two countries. As predicted from the results of study 1, the AAS scores
of Japanese mothers also indicated that they were significantly more tolerant of their
child’s amae behaviours than their British counterparts. This was true for both
mothers of securely and insecurely attached children. A tendency for mothers of securely attached children to have less tolerant attitudes towards children’s amae
behaviours than those of insecurely attached children was found in both countries. A
cultural difference also emerged in the way children expressed the maternal needs of
the child doll during the mildly stressful scenarios in the MCAST.
The third study examined actual mother-child interaction in both countries,
measuring the mother’s emotional availability to the child (using the Emotional
Availability Scale: Biringen, 2000) and relating this to both maternal AAS and child
MCAST data. The results showed that emotional availability scores and attachment
classification patterns did not differ across cultures. Analysis of the home
observations also indicated that children from both cultures who were classified as
insecurely attached (ambivalent and disorganised type) in the MCAST tended to
show more amae behaviours towards their mothers than children classified as
securely attached.
Together, these three studies suggest that children in both counties show similar
attachment patterns and that it is not only Japanese children who express amae
behaviours towards their mothers. In fact, amae relates to attachment security in both
cultures, although the way it is expressed and maternal attitudes towards such
behaviours differ across cultures.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6196
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Komatsu, K. (2011). Emotional availability in Japan: Linkages with children’s attachment representations. The Journal of Family Education Research Institute, 32, 102-111.
en
dc.subject
attachment
en
dc.subject
amae
en
dc.subject
cross-cultural
en
dc.title
Attachment and amae: a comparative study of mother-child close relationships in Japan and Britain
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Komatsu2011.pdf
- Size:
- 6.68 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

