Edinburgh Research Archive

Evaluating Automatic Summaries of Meeting Recordings

Simple item page
dc.contributor.author
Murray, Gabriel
en
dc.contributor.author
Renals, Steve
en
dc.contributor.author
Carletta, Jean
en
dc.contributor.author
Moore, Johanna
en
dc.date.accessioned
2006-05-12T12:51:27Z
dc.date.available
2006-05-12T12:51:27Z
dc.date.issued
2005
dc.description.abstract
The research below explores schemes for evaluating automatic summaries of business meetings, using the ICSI Meeting Corpus. Both automatic and subjective evaluations were carried out, with a central interest being whether or not the two types of evaluations correlate with each other. The evaluation metrics were used to compare and contrast differing approaches to automatic summarization, the deterioration of summary quality on ASR output versus manual transcripts, and to determine whether manual extracts are rated significantly higher than automatic extracts.
en
dc.format.extent
72057 bytes
en
dc.format.mimetype
application/pdf
en
dc.identifier.citation
In ACL 2005 Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for MT and/or Summarization, 2005.
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/1039
dc.language.iso
en
dc.subject
Speech Recognition
en
dc.subject
summarization
en
dc.subject
ami
en
dc.title
Evaluating Automatic Summaries of Meeting Recordings
en
dc.type
Article
en

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
murray-mtse05.pdf
Size:
70.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

CSTR publications