Understanding eruption dynamics: insights from volcanic seismicity in Ecuador
dc.contributor.advisor
Bell, Andrew
dc.contributor.advisor
Calder, Eliza
dc.contributor.advisor
Kalnins, Lara
dc.contributor.author
Butcher, Sophie
dc.date.accessioned
2022-03-28T09:40:42Z
dc.date.available
2022-03-28T09:40:42Z
dc.date.issued
2022-03-25
dc.description.abstract
Persistently active volcanoes in close proximity to society can pose a huge danger to infrastructure,
lives and the economy. Careful monitoring of volcanic seismicity is integral to
successful hazard assessment and risk management. Geophysical monitoring at active volcanoes
can provide rich datasets to examine internal systems. Specifically, seismic monitoring
offers the potential to develop real time analysis and forecasts. The generation of volcanic
seismicity has been linked to processes such as magma ascent, degassing and rock fracturing.
However, studies are often limited to individual volcanoes or specific episodes of unrest, and
so it is difficult to compare interpretations. This aim of this thesis is twofold: to develop
methodologies to better quantify and characterise volcanic seismicity, and to use these to
provide new understanding of volcanic systems, the hazards they might pose and how we
can better forecast and monitor unrest.
First, I present an extensive literature review of our current understanding of volcanic
seismicity. As there is no standardised procedure for the analysis of volcanic earthquakes,
there are inconsistent uses of techniques and ambiguous terminology. Existing studies also
tend to focus on a handful of well monitored volcanoes where dense arrays can be used to
calculate source mechanisms and depths to interpret seismic swarms. In order to address
this, I develop a thorough signal processing routine which generates a suite of metrics to
characterise a single earthquake event. These metrics can be used across a sequence of
earthquakes to track changes in the behaviour of seismicity, and distinguish different types
of earthquakes. It is developed with poorly monitored volcanoes in mind, as metrics can
be determined for signal from a single station, and even a single component instrument.
I use parameters in the time domain including amplitude, duration and cross correlation,
and compare three different approaches to calculate the quality (Q) factor, in the frequency
domain.
I then present two candidate volcanoes to apply the methodology and attempt to
describe the internal processes at each. Tungurahua and Cayambe are two relatively understudied
volcanoes and yet they are potentially the most dangerous natural hazards in
Ecuador. Tungurahua’s most recent eruptive phase (1999-2016) was explosive and persistent.
In contrast, Cayambe volcano has not erupted in over 200 years and yet has been
seismically restless in recent years. This presents an opportunity to compare the seismicity
associated with ongoing, and reawakening volcanic processes.
In chapter 4, I characterise the seismicity atTungurahua between 2012 and the final explosions
in 2016. Seismicity at Tungurahua was dominated by long-period (LP) earthquakes,
particularly episodes of highly periodic, repeating LP seismicity, known as drumbeats. In
this chapter, I show that persistent drumbeats occur in phase with cyclical Vulcanian eruptions.
These events are attributed to the initial failure and subsequent resealing of an upper
conduit plug. In each explosive episode, the signal metrics are able to distinguish a shift in
the signal properties of drumbeat LPs. In chapter 5, I focus specifically on accelerating rates
of drumbeat LPs, often considered precursors to eruptions. I use temporal statistics and a
Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach to model three episodes of drumbeats. In one
significant episode, the last ever recorded drumbeats at Tungurahua, I show these events are
precursors to a ‘failed’ attempt at an explosion. In chapter 6 I then compare these findings at
Tungurahua, with the 2016 seismic crisis at Cayambe. Here I demonstrate the repeating LP
seismicity is likely a result of shallow hydrothermal systems, rather than surficial ‘icequakes’
or magmatic ascent. However, swarms of volcano-tectonic events (VTs) in 2016, are likely
attributed to stresses on regional faults and ascent of a new pulse of magma. Finally, I begin
to explore the complex volcano-tectonic interactions at both Tungurahua and Cayambe.
Where there are high rates of tectonic events globally, and high rates of eruptions, it is important
to distinguish causality and coincidence. VT swarms at Cayambe occur two months
after the Mw7.8 Pedernales earthquake, 200km west. Using models of static stress change I
suggest the crust at Cayambe was subject to a dilational regime, prompting resumed activity
in 2016. However, the Pedernales earthquake occurs just two months after the final eruption
at Tungurahua and yet does not appear to promote or restrict further explosive activity.
This thesis presents case studies of two active volcanoes that are subject to limited
seismic monitoring. These methods are not computationally intensive and could be readily
adopted into routine volcano monitoring, to further inform hazard assessment. Although
Cayambe and Tungurahua are neighbouring volcanoes, comparable in their rheology, they
are very different in their current dynamic state, and this is evident in the seismicity. An
enhanced understanding of these systems should inform further assessment of seismicity at
intermediate-composition, arc volcanoes.
en
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/1842/38817
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/2071
dc.language.iso
en
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.title
Understanding eruption dynamics: insights from volcanic seismicity in Ecuador
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- ButcherS_2022.pdf
- Size:
- 82.3 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

