Collective social capital: a study of new public health and end-of-life care
dc.contributor.advisor
Murray, Scott
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Lawton, Julia
en
dc.contributor.author
Sallnow, Elizabeth Sian
en
dc.date.accessioned
2018-09-17T12:15:44Z
dc.date.available
2018-09-17T12:15:44Z
dc.date.issued
2018-11-30
dc.description.abstract
Background:
An appreciation of the broader social determinants of health and wellbeing has led
to the inclusion of new public health principles and practice within health and social
care. End-of-life care has been no exception and there exists a favourable policy
context, significant body of theoretical work, substantial practitioner interest and
numerous practice examples. Despite this context, there has been little empirical
exploration and the approaches remain poorly characterised.
Aims and objectives:
The aim of this study was to understand the impact a new public health approach to
end-of-life care project can have when initiated through a hospice. Specifically this
study sought to explore how a compassionate community project is experienced,
what tensions exist, what processes support or impede the work, what specific
challenges such a project developed from within this sector presents and what
learning exists for the wider field.
Methods:
A mixed methods study employing multiple methods of data collection was
performed. Data collection methods included: interviews; focus groups; participant
observation; documentary analysis and service records. Ethics approval was
obtained. Data were analysed according to modified grounded theory and using
online software tool Dedoose.
Results:
Twenty-one interviews, two focus groups and 19 episodes of participant observation
were conducted, 11 documents and service data on 180 Compassionate
Neighbours and 173 Community Members were also included. Six key actions
facilitated integration of new public health approaches with service provision
approaches. Impacts from the work were wide ranging and included a reduction in
loneliness, improvements in wellbeing and changes to hospice practice.
Further to this, three underlying drivers emerged that underpinned the work as a
whole. They were seen to translate the observed actions of the project into the
impacts and included: altered power dynamics, expression of reciprocity in
relationships and the development of agency.
Discussion:
The three drivers allow a deeper appreciation of the factors involved in the
development of a compassionate community. The redressing of power dynamics
within traditional provider-recipient relationships allowed for more equity, and
created a space for reciprocal and mutual relations to emerge. Not only were these
reciprocal relations observed between those at the end of life and those visiting
them, but also between participants in the project and the hospice. In order to
adequately capture these new perspectives offered through this study, a new term
collective social capital is introduced. This moves beyond existing
conceptualisations of social capital in end-of-life care to provide novel perspectives
on the role of reciprocity and interdependency between the lay and professional
worlds.
Conclusion:
This study provides a reflexive and critical account of the processes and impacts of
compassionate communities work in practice. It situates reciprocal relationships as
its foundation and forces an assessment of the nature of power and agency in all
interactions. Through the presentation of the new concept of collective social capital,
it presents a collaborative and interdependent path forward for new public health
and end-of-life care in the future.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/33037
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Paul, S. and Sallnow, L. (2013) ‘Public health approaches to end-of-life care in the UK: an online survey of palliative care services’, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 3, pp. 196–199.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Sallnow, L., Bunnin, A. and Richardson, H. (2015) Community development and hospices: A national UK perspective, Compassionate Communities: Case Studies from Britain and Europe. Oxon: Routledge.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Sallnow, L., Kumar, S. and Kellehear, A. (2012) International Perspectives on Public Health and Palliative Care. London: Routledge.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Sallnow, L., Kumar, S. and Kellehear, A. (2013) International perspectives on public health and palliative care, International Perspectives on Public Health and Palliative Care.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Sallnow, L., Kumar, S. and Numpeli, M. (2010) ‘Home-based palliative care in Kerala, India: The Neighbourhood Network in Palliative Care’, Progress in Palliative Care. 01 Feb 201, 18(1), pp. 14–17.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Sallnow, L., Kumar, S. and Numpeli, M. (2010) ‘Home-based palliative care in Kerala, India: The Neighbourhood Network in Palliative Care’, Progress in Palliative Care. 01 Feb 201, 18(1), pp. 14–17.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Sallnow, L., Richardson, H., Murray, S. A., et al. (2016) ‘The impact of a new public health approach to end-of-life care: A systematic review’, Palliative Medicine, 30(3), pp. 200–211.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Sallnow, L.and Paul, S. (2015) ‘Understanding community engagement in end-of-life care: developing conceptual clarity’, Critical Public Health. Routledge, 25(2), pp. 231–238.
en
dc.subject
palliative care
en
dc.subject
public health
en
dc.subject
community development
en
dc.subject
compassionate communities
en
dc.title
Collective social capital: a study of new public health and end-of-life care
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Sallnow2018.pdf
- Size:
- 14.25 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

