Edinburgh Research Archive

On the complexity of matrix multiplication

dc.contributor.advisor
Davie, Alexander
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Gyongy, Istvan
en
dc.contributor.author
Stothers, Andrew James
en
dc.contributor.sponsor
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
en
dc.date.accessioned
2011-02-01T10:14:31Z
dc.date.available
2011-02-01T10:14:31Z
dc.date.issued
2010
dc.description.abstract
The evaluation of the product of two matrices can be very computationally expensive. The multiplication of two n×n matrices, using the “default” algorithm can take O(n3) field operations in the underlying field k. It is therefore desirable to find algorithms to reduce the “cost” of multiplying two matrices together. If multiplication of two n × n matrices can be obtained in O(nα) operations, the least upper bound for α is called the exponent of matrix multiplication and is denoted by ω. A bound for ω < 3 was found in 1968 by Strassen in his algorithm. He found that multiplication of two 2 × 2 matrices could be obtained in 7 multiplications in the underlying field k, as opposed to the 8 required to do the same multiplication previously. Using recursion, we are able to show that ω ≤ log2 7 < 2.8074, which is better than the value of 3 we had previously. In chapter 1, we look at various techniques that have been found for reducing ω. These include Pan’s Trilinear Aggregation, Bini’s Border Rank and Sch¨onhage’s Asymptotic Sum inequality. In chapter 2, we look in detail at the current best estimate of ω found by Coppersmith and Winograd. We also propose a different method of evaluating the “value” of trilinear forms. Chapters 3 and 4 build on the work of Coppersmith and Winograd and examine how cubing and raising to the fourth power of Coppersmith and Winograd’s “complicated” algorithm affect the value of ω, if at all. Finally, in chapter 5, we look at the Group-Theoretic context proposed by Cohn and Umans, and see how we can derive some of Coppersmith and Winograd’s values using this method, as well as showing how working in this context can perhaps be more conducive to showing ω = 2.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/4734
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
algebra
en
dc.subject
complexity
en
dc.subject
maxtrix
en
dc.subject
rank
en
dc.subject
Coppersmith
en
dc.subject
Winograd
en
dc.subject
algorithm
en
dc.subject
Salem-Spencer
en
dc.title
On the complexity of matrix multiplication
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Stothers2010.pdf
Size:
550.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

This item appears in the following Collection(s)