Relation of the doctrine of the word of God to the doctrine of the Imago Dei
Files
Item Status
Embargo End Date
Date
Authors
Morris, Ivor Francis
Abstract
The following investigation arose out of a desire
to Tinder stand and to expound a central theme in the theology
of Professor Karl Earth. It has been undertaken with the object
of shewing the importance of the doctrine of the imago Dei in
the kind of theology which he is now writing. The difficulties
attending such an undertaking are obvious.
For instance, it may be argued that in order to arrive at a sound, logical estimate
of a writer's theological standpoint, it would be necessary to
have available not only a complete list of his works but also
the considered Judgment of history as a guide and corrective
to the investigation. But in the case of Earth neither of these
things exist, since he is still engaged in writing his major
treatise on dogmatics. This being so, does it then follow as
a consequence that the task conceived is both too hazardous
and too untimely to be attempted? The question seems to be
unanswerable and yet on consideration the objection which it
implies is by no means insuperable.
In actuality, it is necessary to have neither a full list of Barth's works nor the verdict
of history upon his views, in order to reach a valid estimate
of his doctrine. Of course it is a real disadvantage not to
be able to refer to these in the process of research, but
without them research work may proceed, since the primary
factors in this thesis are belief in the task envisaged, faithfulness
to Scripture, and a sufficient grasp of the nature
of the theological problem as it is presented to the mind
of Karl Barth. Already Barth has given to his readers a clear
idea of what he is thinking.
Moreover, the research student has in this case the added
advantage of proximity in time to a theologian as great in
intellectual stature as Earth. The elapse of time might cause
some vivid impression of this new theology to grow dim, for
it is important to realise that what Barth is saying is something
new, not merely a new emphasis on the divine factor in revelation,
not merely a statement of the old Protestant orthodoxy in modern
terms, but a genuine reawakening, a coming to life of thought in
what might not ineptly be described as the re-birth of Reformed
theology.
To be caught in the movement of this theology is an advantage
outweighing every disadvantage, for the experience of being
convinced by the theology of Barth signifies, not the
elimination, but the most strenuous exercise of the critical
powers of human reason.
Thus paradoxically, reason finds its highest
function in theology, in the very sphere which denies to it
the inherent power to achieve knowledge of the nature and
Being of God, Yet it is part of the genius of Barth as a
theologian that he kindles and in no wise damps the urge of
the individual investigator to find rational expression in
theology. The entire spirit or motif of his writings is
embodied in the Scriptural injunction to search the written
Word and be wise unto salvation. When this is done, he
is seen as an ally, a fellow-labourer in the intellectual
vineyard of faith. Therefore the fact may no longer be
denied that the flavour and content of the ensuing thesis
will be of the kind found in the new Reformed theology.
Consequently there now remains nothing else to do than to
state in brief outline the purpose and plan which will form
the guiding threads of the investigation.
It is the aim of this study to establish, develop,
and confirm the statement that there is and can be no true
likeness to God in man, apart from the desire, power and
purpose of God to create that likeness in man in and through
the revelation of Himself in His Word, Jesus Christ. The
implications of this statement are positive and negative.
Positively, the actualisation of the imago
Dei in the sphere of created living things depends upon the
power of God to reveal or make Himself known to man in and
through His Word.
.
Revelation is the sole concern of theology. The
doctrine of God is prior to and determinative for the doctrine
of man. The doctrine of the Word determines the doctrine of the
imago Dei. The knowledge of God provides the necessary key to
the understanding of man. Therefore to speak of a reflection of
God in the depths of man's being apart from the power of God to
reveal Himself, is clearly absurd, since God is Lord over His own
reflection.
Negatively, the implication of the statement which
has been made is that natural theology in all its forms is
rendered untenable. Natural theology assumes that in the nature
of created man there may discerned an essential and unbroken
kinship with and likeness to God apart from the revelation of
God in His Word. It does not deny the supremacy and perfection
of that revelation. What it seeks to establish is that the
perfect revelation in Jesus Christ took place on the basis of a
relation of resemblance already permanently existing between
God and man. Accordingly it seeks a natural point of contact
between man and God, a starting point in human nature for the
theological consideration of God's self-revelation. This it
finds in the imago Del.
In view of the assumptions and claims of natural
theology the doctrine of the imago Dei must be re-stated in its
relationship to the doctrine of the Word of God. The first and
most obvious task will be to examine, understand and then
criticise the leading forms of natural theology in modern thought.
The natural starting point for this will be where
natural theology appears in its most patent form, in the Roman
Catholic doctrine of the analogia entis. Thus the first Part
of the thesis will be devoted to a consideration of this doctrine.
The theology of Przywara as a brilliant exponent of the subject
will be given special attention.
Following upon this, the theological phenomenon
of theocentricism, or the natural theology of faith, will be
made the object of analysis. Here the basis of modern Protestant
theology in the works of Schleiermacher will be discussed with
special reference to Wobbermln and Schaeder, two modern
theocentric thinkers.
The last critical aspect of the subject will be
dealt with in the third Fart of the thesis, in which Emil
Brunner's views on the imago Dei are examined.
But throughout the polemical atmosphere of the
first three Parts, the positive aim of the investigation will
not be overlooked or neglected. Against the antithetical background
provided by the three forms of natural theology considered,
the subject of the relation between the imago Dei
and the Word of God will be developed and given ever clearer
definition, until in the last Part of the thesis the way is
opened for a positive recapitulation and reconstruction of
the doctrine of the imago Dei in its relation to revelation,
while lastly and not least in significance there is given an
account of the Scriptural foundations of the theological
statements which have been made.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

