Aesthetic perception, nature and experience
dc.contributor.advisor
Lewis, Peter
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Brady, Emily
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Nudds, Matthew
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Ward, Dave
en
dc.contributor.author
Hall, Nicole Annette
en
dc.date.accessioned
2015-01-12T15:35:28Z
dc.date.available
2015-01-12T15:35:28Z
dc.date.issued
2014-07-01
dc.description.abstract
This thesis is about the perceptual nature of aesthetic experience and the importance of
nature as a paradigmatic object of aesthetic perception and aesthetic experience more
broadly conceived. For this reason, it merits serious attention by philosophers working
in aesthetics, as has been argued since Ronald Hepburn’s seminal essay “Contemporary
Aesthetics and the Neglect of Natural Beauty”. If aesthetic experience is anything, it is
at least perceptual. It is a mode of perceptual experience that is the result of having been
attentive to and having discriminated between, the aesthetic and non-aesthetic, and
invites room for reflection on, and connections to be made with, cognitive and emotive
processes. Rooting the aesthetic in perception allows us to recognize and understand
that it has an impact on our daily activities, rather than being restricted either to a
particular kind of object, to the knowledge we might have about it, or to intense, rarefied
aesthetic experience. If an object is to be an aesthetic object it need not be an artwork,
indeed, one might even argue that nature is more interesting an aesthetic object from the
perspective that it is indeterminate, not the result of human intentionality, and from an
existential point of view, one that acknowledges our dependence on it. In the course of
the argument, I thus resist the idea that the aesthetic experience of art is necessarily prior
to the aesthetic experience of nature. The perceptual account put forward is based on a
realist account of aesthetic properties that considers aesthetic properties to be perceptual
properties and that considers aesthetic experience to be perceptually rich. I link it to the
idea of ‘whole formalism’, a perceptual, aesthetic account that is nestled in the wider
thought that aesthetic perception relates, although not causally, to other features of
experience, such as emotion, and knowledge. Perceptual, aesthetic experience is thus not
reduced to an austere account of aesthetic formalism.
The thesis begins by analysing
historical accounts of aesthetic perception, beginning with Plato, Aristotle and Aquinas.
It builds on this analysis by reinterpreting crucial concepts to the discipline of aesthetics,
such as disinterest and formalism that originated in the eighteenth century and are
relevant to the idea of aesthetic perception. It then brings the idea of aesthetic perception
up to date by addressing the current debate about cognitivism and non-cognitivism about
aesthetic experience where nature is concerned. By tracing the idea of aesthetic
perception historically, I will have also shown the role of nature as a paradigm of
aesthetic experience through history and that nature is a repository for rich aesthetic
experience and for rich experiential engagement with it.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/9857
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
aesthetic experience
en
dc.subject
nature
en
dc.subject
aesthetic perception
en
dc.title
Aesthetic perception, nature and experience
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Hall2014.pdf
- Size:
- 1.07 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

