Edinburgh Research Archive

UK Paediatricians’ medical decision-making for severely disabled children: a socio-legal analysis

dc.contributor.advisor
Laurie, Graeme
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Cowan, Sharon
en
dc.contributor.author
Picton-Howell, Zoe
en
dc.date.accessioned
2018-09-21T14:38:45Z
dc.date.available
2018-09-21T14:38:45Z
dc.date.issued
2018-11-28
dc.description.abstract
This thesis aims to illuminate how paediatricians in the United Kingdom (UK) make difficult medical decisions when treating severely disabled children with complex health conditions. In particular, it examines the part played, if any, by law, rights, and ethics in those decisions. After drawing on jurisprudence of the English and European Human Rights Court, together with existing scholarship, to analyse the doctors’ decision making, this thesis adopts a legal consciousness theoretical approach. Using this it looks at how the paediatricians make sense of and conceptualise law when making these decisions. It examines how decisions are, by the paediatricians’ own accounts, commonly made at present and what the paediatricians say about how they and their colleagues make such decisions. This thesis addresses the following research questions: i) Which decisions do UK paediatricians find particularly difficult when working with disabled children and what makes those decisions particularly difficult? ii) What factors do UK paediatricians take into consideration when making difficult decisions for disabled children and what weight do they put on those factors? iii) What formal education in law, rights, and ethics have the doctors received and to what extent, if any, can we discern how this education impacts on their difficult decisions for disabled children? iv) How do UK paediatricians construct and understand the law, rights, and ethics when making their difficult decisions? This thesis makes an original contribution, being the first in-depth socio-legal study examining UK paediatricians’ medical decision-making for severely disabled children, by identifying two distinct styles paediatricians adopt when approaching best interest decisions, and by recommending a new category of legal consciousness. It concludes by recommending research and changes both in doctors’ training and approach to best interest decision-making to address the current challenges paediatricians describe facing when deciding for severely disabled children.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/33061
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
best interests
en
dc.subject
paediatricians
en
dc.subject
children
en
dc.subject
doctors
en
dc.subject
end-of-life
en
dc.subject
disabled
en
dc.title
UK Paediatricians’ medical decision-making for severely disabled children: a socio-legal analysis
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Picton-Howell2018.pdf
Size:
6.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

This item appears in the following Collection(s)