Transmuting values in artificial intelligence: investigating the motivations and contextual constraints shaping the ethics of artificial intelligence practitioners
dc.contributor.advisor
Luger, Ewa
dc.contributor.advisor
Speed, Chris
dc.contributor.author
Bennett, S. J.
dc.date.accessioned
2023-11-13T16:23:44Z
dc.date.available
2023-11-13T16:23:44Z
dc.date.issued
2023-11-13
dc.description.abstract
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research and development have seen AI applied in
various high-stakes domains such as healthcare and welfare. Furthermore, portrayals of AI are
often characterised by narratives of perpetual progress and sleek optimisation, obscuring the
intricate interactions of materiality and socio-political decision-making inherently embedded
within wider systems of design and development. The resulting ethical and social concerns
have prompted proposal of numerous frameworks, tools and guidelines for the ethical design
and development of AI. However, translating these proposals into practice has proven
challenging, and there is a paucity of research into the practical contexts shaping the ethico-onto-epistemology of AI practice. In this thesis I illustrate these contexts via the accounts of
24 AI practitioners, complemented by ethnographic observations from an industry research
lab, examining the values which motivate practitioners, the constraints which shape their
practice, and their approaches to ethics.
Weaving through these discussions of practice, values, and the nature of
responsibility, I examine how ambiguities pervade practice and shape the realities of ethical
reflection and engagement at all stages of development. My findings uncover practitioner
motivations linked with interconnected intellectual and moral values, how these related to
intellectual conduct and culture within the field, and how practitioner heuristics for ethical
decision-making are often relational and character-based in nature. This realization of values
in practice is tempered by numerous constraints including hardware limitations, epistemic
cultures, and ethical knowledge.
Drawing upon the Ethics of Ambiguity, I discuss how the
uncertainty, ambiguity and unequal access to resources shaping AI practice necessitate a
process-focused ethics which pivots away from solutions, towards critical contextual
reflexivity and awareness of how contexts impact realisation of values. To this end, I
demonstrate how The Ethics of Ambiguity can offer a path forward for ethical AI practice.
This vision of AI practice embraces ambiguities rather than attempting to segment and
sideline them, focusing on how practitioner decisions (and their eventual outputs) impact
others’ freedoms while acknowledging the multiplicity of values across socio- and geo-political contexts.
en
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/1842/41155
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/3891
dc.language.iso
en
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bennett, SJ., Claisse, C., Luger, E., and Durrant, A., 2023. Unpicking Epistemic Injustices in Digital Health: On Designing Data-Driven Technologies to Support the Self-Management of Long-Term Health Conditions. In Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society.
en
dc.subject
AI ethics
en
dc.subject
Artificial Intelligence
en
dc.subject
ethics
en
dc.subject
STS
en
dc.subject
Science and Technology Studies
en
dc.title
Transmuting values in artificial intelligence: investigating the motivations and contextual constraints shaping the ethics of artificial intelligence practitioners
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Bennett2023.pdf
- Size:
- 1.62 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

