Origin and meaning of the New Testament term Parousia
dc.contributor.author
Hay, James Charles
en
dc.date.accessioned
2018-09-13T15:59:56Z
dc.date.available
2018-09-13T15:59:56Z
dc.date.issued
1962
dc.description.abstract
en
dc.description.abstract
Just at the time when the outline for this thesis had
been determined and the work begun I had the disturbing privilege of reading the manuscript for chapter eight of James
Barr's book 'The Semantics of Biblical Language' (1). In
this chapter, entitled 'Some Principles of Kittel's Dictionary', Kittel is charged with pursuing a history of concepts
by means of a dictionary of words. The pursuit of a history
of concepts is of course recognised as quite valid, but not
by means of the lexical method of the TWNT. This raised some
questions in my own mind about the approach that I had adopted for this thesis. I had before me the article on ' parousia'
by A. Oepke (2), which in some measure does merit the criticism
made by James Barr (3). I also had before me the research of
P. L. Schoonheim published under the title 'Een Semasiologisch
Onderzoek Van Parousia' (4), which, as the title suggests, confines itself in large measure to a strictly linguistic analysis of the problem. It did not seem to me however that either
quite answered the questions uppermost in my own mind: why did
so many of the New Testament writers judge this term equal to
the task of giving expression to the concept of the coming of
Christ, and what is its relationship to that concept. With
some hesitation I would suggest that Oepke failed in part because he was too much concerned with the larger concept of the
coming of God to man, and Schoonheim because the task of exegesis was made subservient to his lingusitic analysis. In
saying this of course I do not want for a moment to depreciate
the value of either of these works. The latter especially I
found to be most helpful. But the problem of the relationship
of the word to the concept still remained, and great care had
to be taken that the method by which these questions might be
answered did not fall prey to the criticisms offered by Barr.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/32404
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.ispartof
Annexe Thesis Digitisation Project 2018 Block 20
en
dc.relation.isreferencedby
en
dc.title
Origin and meaning of the New Testament term Parousia
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- HayJC_1962redux.pdf
- Size:
- 53.88 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

