Greek slavery and social mobility, 800 - 300 BC
dc.contributor.advisor
Lewis, David
dc.contributor.advisor
Canevaro, Mirko
dc.contributor.author
Anastasiadis, Marios
dc.contributor.sponsor
A.G. Leventis Foundation
en
dc.contributor.sponsor
Germany Academic Exchange Service
en
dc.contributor.sponsor
Economic History Society
en
dc.date.accessioned
2024-07-09T09:04:07Z
dc.date.available
2024-07-09T09:04:07Z
dc.date.issued
2024-07-09
dc.description.abstract
The phenomenon of social mobility in the archaic and classical Greek world has been studied primarily in relation to the free and with a disproportionate emphasis placed on elites. Where the conversation has been extended to include slaves, social mobility has often been taken to be synonymous with manumission and a few ‘exceptional’ cases and by now well-known (primarily Athenian) sources have been privileged, namely about bankers, prostitutes, and miners.
This study goes beyond the usual familiar evidence and investigates slaves’ chances for status betterment both within and beyond slavery in archaic Greece, classical Sparta, classical Crete, and classical Athens. I argue that in order to investigate slaves’ lives and chances for social movement and social mobility one needs to go from the general to the granular, for it is there that motives and dynamics lay. Each chapter, then, investigates the ways in which slaves could improve their condition in the context of their own unique, local circumstances, not least through capitalising on slaveholders’ inherent reliance on them for surplus.
Slaves weaponizing their autonomy and agency can be traced all the way back to Homer, perhaps best encapsulated in the example of the loyal swineherd by the name of Eumaios, and can also be found in real-life examples contemporary to Homer. In classical Sparta, though the ban on private manumission was unique, economic and geopolitical realities meant that helots, who existed under a sharecropping arrangement, could achieve economic differentiation between themselves but could also find their freedom through service in war. In the case of Crete, by building on recent work that has challenged the general picture of economic austerity, I argue that slaves there, too, could achieve status differentiation, including through their labour and amassing a peculium, a fact that is confirmed through an investigation of Gortynian laws. In Attica, where the evidence is most extensive, a thorough investigation of the occupational lexicon takes us beyond the well-known examples of slave bankers and prostitutes and contributes new insight into slaves’ centrality to the economy, specialisation and competencies; it was these that in each case allowed slaves to improve and sometimes exit their condition of slavery.
en
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/1842/41964
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/4687
dc.language.iso
en
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.rights.embargodate
2026-07-09
en
dc.subject
ancient Greek economy
en
dc.subject
slave management
en
dc.subject
slave occupations
en
dc.subject
slave social mobility
en
dc.subject
Gortynian laws
en
dc.title
Greek slavery and social mobility, 800 - 300 BC
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
dcterms.accessRights
RESTRICTED ACCESS
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Anastasiadis2024.pdf
- Size:
- 1.94 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

