Valve and the ventricle: advances in the assessment and management of aortic stenosis
dc.contributor.advisor
Newby, David
dc.contributor.advisor
Dweck, Marc
dc.contributor.author
Bing, Rong
dc.contributor.sponsor
other
en
dc.date.accessioned
2022-02-07T14:00:46Z
dc.date.available
2022-02-07T14:00:46Z
dc.date.issued
2021-12-08
dc.description.abstract
Background
Aortic stenosis is the commonest valve disease in the Western world, progresses inexorably
over years and has no effective lifestyle or drug treatments. Left untreated, aortic stenosis
leads to symptoms such as breathlessness and chest pain, followed by cardiac failure and
death. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the only treatment, for which surgery has been the
default technique for decades. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), a much less
invasive strategy, has substantially expanded the population in whom we now consider AVR.
Importantly, the implantation of a prosthetic valve should be considered a means of
converting a patient with severe native valve disease to a patient with a well-functioning
prosthesis, rather than a cure for valve disease per se. There are potential complications that
can arise following successful valve replacement, including valve thrombosis and structural
valve degeneration.
Given the above, several controversies and questions exist. These include: 1) What is the
optimal method of assessing aortic stenosis severity in low-flow states and in valves where
fibrosis contributes significantly to valve obstruction? 2) Are there deleterious effects on
myocardial health from aortic stenosis that occur prior to symptom onset or a fall in ejection
fraction, and that provide prognostic information? 3) Are there drug therapies that can retard
the progression of aortic stenosis? 4) Are there novel methods of detecting bioprosthetic
valve thrombus that may provide insight into mechanisms governing valve durability?
Methods
In study one, we developed a unique method of assessing the anatomy of the aortic valve and
the severity of aortic stenosis using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). This
method has several advantages over non-contrast CT aortic valve calcium scoring (CT-AVC)
– the current standard flow-independent measure of aortic stenosis severity – which include
spatial resolution, anatomical definition and the ability to quantify non-calcific leaflet
thickening in addition to calcific volume. This technique was applied in a post-hoc analysis
of a prospectively recruited population of patients with aortic stenosis enrolled in a
randomised controlled trial. Patients had undergone standardised echocardiography, non-contrast CT and contrast-enhanced CT.
In study two, we investigated a novel echocardiographic measurement, first-phase ejection
fraction (EF1), in aortic stenosis. This parameter is the ejection fraction measured at the time
of peak aortic velocity, rather than across the entire cardiac cycle, and is a measure of early
left ventricular contractility which can be impaired in aortic stenosis. This technique was
applied in a post-hoc analysis of a prospectively recruited population of patients with aortic
stenosis enrolled in an observational study. Patients had undergone standardised
echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Subsequent AVR and death were
captured from medical records.
In study three, we undertook a double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial of the anti-osteoporotic drugs denosumab and alendronic acid to determine whether they could slow
disease progression in aortic stenosis. This hypothesis arose from a body of pre-clinical and
observational data suggesting that bone turnover and osteoblastic differentiation of valvular
interstitial cells are important contributory mechanisms to aortic valve calcification, and that
modification of the receptor activator of nuclear kappa B (RANK)
ligand/RANK/osteoprotegerin axis might ameliorate valvular calcification. Patients were
randomised in a 2:1:2:1 ratio to denosumab (60 mg every 6 months), placebo injection,
alendronic acid (70 mg once weekly) or placebo capsule. Participants underwent serial
assessments with Doppler echocardiography, CT-AVC and 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF)
positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT). The primary endpoint
was the calculated 24-month change in CT-AVC.
In study four, we undertook the first ever cardiac study of 18F-GP1. This is a novel
radiotracer that binds to the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, which are upregulated on activated
platelets. We investigated whether 18F-GP1 PET-CT could detect thrombus formation on
bioprosthetic aortic valves. First, ex vivo validation of 18F-GP1 binding was conducted in
explanted bioprosthetic valves leaflets using histology (Movat’s pentachrome),
immunohistochemistry (CD41) and autoradiography (18F-GP1). Second, patients with
bioprosthetic aortic valve prostheses who were not on anticoagulation were enrolled and
underwent standardised echocardiography and 18F-GP1 PET-CT. Patients with normal
native aortic valves who had undergone 18F-GP1 PET-CT as part of a contemporaneous
study formed a control cohort. Two patients with clinically confirmed obstructive
bioprosthetic valve thrombosis, recruited as part of a proof-of-concept case series by
collaborators in Germany, were also included in the analysis.
Results
In study one, 164 patients with aortic stenosis were included for analysis (78% male; 41 mild,
89 moderate, 34 severe). We demonstrated that non-calcific and calcific aortic valve leaflet
volumes on contrast-enhanced CT correlated well with echocardiographic peak aortic jet
velocity (r=0.67, p<0.001). In particular, quantification of the total non-calcific and calcific
leaflet volume demonstrated better correlation with echocardiographic peak aortic velocity
than non-contrast CT-AVC in women (r=0.72 and r=0.38 respectively).
In study two, 149 patients with aortic stenosis were included for analysis (70% male; 34 mild,
40 moderate, 75 severe). We demonstrated that EF1 can be impaired despite a normal overall
ejection fraction, that a low EF1 is associated with increased global left ventricular afterload
and more myocardial fibrosis, and that there is a potential for EF1 to improve following
AVR. Importantly, a low EF1 was associated with future AVR or death, independent of mean
aortic valve gradient (hazard ratio 5.6, 95% confidence interval 3.4-9.1).
In study three, we enrolled and randomised 150 patients (mean age 72±8 years, 21% female,
peak aortic jet velocity 3.36 [interquartile range 2.93 to 3.82] m/s) to denosumab (n=49),
alendronic acid (n=51) or placebo tablet or injection (total n=50). Despite an unequivocal
pharmacodynamic effect of the active drugs, as confirmed by a halving of the serum C-terminal telopeptide concentration at 6 months in the denosumab and alendronic acid arms,
we found no differences in 24-month change in CT-AVC between denosumab and placebo
(343 [198 to 804] Agatston Units (AU) versus 354 [76 to 675] AU, p=0.41), or alendronic
acid and placebo (326 [138 to 813] AU versus 354 [76 to 675] AU, p=0.49). Similarly, there
were no differences in change in peak aortic jet velocity or 18F-NaF aortic valve uptake.
In study four, we undertook 18F-GP1 PET-CT in 75 participants (53 with bioprosthetic
valves, median time from implantation 37 [12 to 80] months; 22 with normal native valves).
All bioprosthetic valves, but no native aortic valves, demonstrated focal 18F-GP1 uptake in
the valve leaflets. On multivariable analysis, higher 18F-GP1 uptake was independently
associated with duration of valve implantation (p=0.002) and hypoattenuated leaflet
thickening (p=0.004) but not with valve type. One patient had suspected clinical valve
thrombosis, confirmed on 18F-GP1 PET-CT, in addition to the two patients with known
obstructive valve thrombosis. All 3 were anticoagulated for 3 months, leading to resolution of
symptoms, improvement in mean valve gradients and a reduction in 18F-GP1 uptake. Extra-valvular 18F-GP1 uptake was evident across a range of extra-valvular prosthetic material
such as aortic interposition grafts and pacemaker leads.
Conclusions
We have demonstrated that contrast-enhanced CT assessments of non-calcific and calcific
aortic valve leaflet volumes correlated well with echocardiographic assessments of aortic
stenosis severity. This technique has clear benefits over non-contrast CT-AVC. We envisage
the potential for standard integration of contrast-enhanced leaflet volume assessments into
routine TAVI workflows, where a large proportion of patients have discordant
echocardiographic findings, and in patients where the contribution of fibrosis, rather than
purely calcium, may lead to underestimation of stenosis severity as assessed by CT-AVC. We
went on to show that EF1 is a potentially useful echocardiographic measure of early left
ventricular systolic dysfunction that may help risk stratification in patients with
asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. This is pertinent in the current era where early AVR is
being tested in several randomised controlled trials. Additionally, we conclusively
demonstrate in a randomised controlled trial that neither denosumab nor alendronic acid
substantially affect the progression of aortic stenosis. This was a disappointing result but an
important finding that also highlights the importance of randomised controlled trials when
investigating causal relationships. Finally, 18F-GP1 PET-CT may have utility in identifying
focal areas of thrombus and distinguishing them from other causes of hypoattenuation on CT
as well as providing a novel approach to explore factors that may influence valve
thrombogenicity and durability. Taken together, these four studies have provided incremental
advances in the diagnosis, assessment and follow-up of patients with aortic stenosis as well as
generated major impetus for future clinical studies in this important and topical field.
en
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/1842/38539
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/1803
dc.language.iso
en
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Dweck M. Management of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: check or all in? Heart. 2020 Nov 4:heartjnl-2020-317160. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317160.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Dweck MR. The quest for an aortic stenosis cure. Heart. 2020 Sep 11:heartjnl-2020- 317421.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Dweck M. Myocardial fibrosis – why image, how to image and clinical implications. Heart. 2019. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315560.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Cavalcante JL, Everett RJ, Clavel MA, Newby DE, Dweck MD. Imaging and impact of myocardial fibrosis in aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. Feb 2019, 12 (2) 283-296; doi: 0.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.026.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Kwiecinski J, Tzolos E, Cartlidge TRG, Fletcher A, Doris MK, Bing R, Tarkin JM, Seidman MA, Gulsin GS, Cruden NL, Barton AK, Uren NG, Williams MC, Van Beek EJR, Leipsic J, Dey D, Makkar RR, Slomka PJ, Rudd JHF, Newby DE, Sellers SL, Berman DS, Dweck MR. Native Aortic Valve Disease Progression and Bioprosthetic Valve Degeneration in Patients with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Circulation. 2021 Aug 29. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056891.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Shah ASV, Lee KK, Pérez JAR, Campbell D, Astengo F, Logue J, Gallacher PJ, Katikireddi SV, Bing R, Alam SR, Anand A, Sudlow C, Fischbacher CM, Lewsey J, Perel P, Newby DE, Mills NL, McAllister DA. Clinical burden, risk factor impact and outcomes following myocardial infarction and stroke: A 25-year individual patient level linkage study. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Aug;7:100141. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100141.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Andrews JP, Williams MC, van Beek EJR, Lucatelli C, MacNaught G, Clark T, Koglin N, Stephens AW, MacAskill MG, Tavares AA, Dhaliwal K, Dorward DA, Lucas C, Dweck MR, Newby DE. In vivo Thrombosis Imaging in Patients Recovering from COVID 19 and Pulmonary Embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Aug 10. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202011-4182IM.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Tzolos E, Bing R, Newby DE, Dweck MR. Categorising myocardial infarction with advanced cardiovascular imaging. Lancet. 2021 Aug 7;398(10299):e9. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(21)01329-5.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Kwak S, Everett RJ, Treibel TA, Yang S, Hwang D, Ko T, Williams MC, Bing R, Singh T, Joshi S, Lee H, Lee W, Kim YJ, Chin CWL, Fukui M, Al Musa T, Rigolli M, Singh A, Tastet L, Dobson LE, Wiesemann S, Ferreira VM, Captur G, Lee S, Schulz-Menger J, Schelbert EB, Clavel MA, Park SJ, Rheude T, Hadamitzky M, Gerber BL, Newby DE, Myerson SG, Pibarot P, Cavalcante JL, McCann GP, Greenwood JP, Moon JC, Dweck MR, Lee SP. Markers of Myocardial Damage Predict Mortality in Patients With Aortic Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Aug 10;78(6):545-558. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.05.047.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Gu H, Bing R, Chin C, Fang L, White AC, Everett R, Spath N, Park E, Chambers JB, Newby DE, Chiribiri A, Dweck MR, Chowienczyk P. First-phase ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance predicts outcomes in aortic stenosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021 Jun 10;23(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00756-x
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Gu H, Bing R, Chin C, Fang L, White A, Everett R, Spath N, Park E, Chambers J, Newby D, Chiribiri A, Dweck M, Chowienczyk P. First-phase ejection fraction by CMR predicts outcomes in aortic stenosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Sengupta PP, Shrestha S, Kagiyama N, Hamirani Y, Kulkarni H, Yanamala N, Bing R, Chin CWL, Pawade TA, Messika-Zeitoun D, Tastet L, Shen M, Newby DE, Clavel MA, Pibarot P, Dweck MR; Artificial Intelligence for Aortic Stenosis at Risk International Consortium. A Machine-Learning Framework to Identify Distinct Phenotypes of Aortic Stenosis Severity. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 May 11:S1936-878X(21)00286-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.03.020.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Singh T, Bing R. Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: is less more (more or less)? Heart. 2021 May 13. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319126
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Pawade TA*, Doris MK*, Bing R*, White AC, Forsyth L, Evans E, Graham C, Williams MC, van Beek EJR, Fletcher A, Adamson PD, Andrews JPM, Cartlidge TRG, Jenkins WSA, Syed M, Fujisawa T, Lucatelli C, Fraser W, Ralston SH, Boon N, Prendergast B, Newby DR, Dweck MRD. Effect of Denosumab or Alendronic Acid on the Progression of Aortic Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Circulation. 2021 Apr 29. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053708.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Cartlidge TR*, Bing R*, Kwiecinski J, Guzzetti E, Pawade TA, Doris MK, Adamson PD, Massera D, Lembo M, Peeters FECM, Couture C, Berman DS, Dey D, Slomka P, Pibarot P, Newby DE, Clavel MA, Dweck MR. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography assessment of aortic stenosis. Heart. 2021 Jan 29:heartjnl-2020-318556. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020- 318556
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Fletcher AJ, Lembo M, Kwiecinski J, Syed MBJ, Nash J, Tzolos E, Bing R, Cadet S, MacNaught G, van Beek EJR, Moss AJ, Doris MK, Walker NL, Dey D, Adamson PD, Newby DE, Slomka PJ, Dweck MR. Quantifying microcalcification activity in the thoracic aorta. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 Jan 20. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02458-w.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Williams MC, Massera D, Moss AJ, Bing R, Bularga A, Adamson PD, Hunter A, Alam S, Shah ASV, Pawade T, Roditi G, van Beek EJR, Nicol ED, Newby DE, Dweck MR. Prevalence and clinical implications of valvular calcification on coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Dec 11:jeaa263. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa263.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Doris MK, Meah MN, Moss AJ, Andrews JPM, Bing R, Gillen R, Weir N, Syed M, Daghem M, Shah A, Williams MC, van Beek EJR, Forsyth L, Dey D, Slomka PJ, Dweck MR, Newby DE, Adamson PD. Coronary 18F-Fluoride Uptake and Progression of Coronary Artery Calcification. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Dec;13(12):e011438. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.011438. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Dweck M. Management of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: check or all in? Heart. 2020 Nov 4:heartjnl-2020-317160. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317160.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Lee KK, Bing R, Kiang J, Bashir S, Spath N, Stelzle D, Mortimer K, Bularga A, Doudesis D, Joshi SS, Strachan F, Gumy S, Adair-Rohani H, Attia EF, Chung MH, Miller MR, Newby DE, Mills NL, McAllister DA, Shah ASV. Adverse health effects associated with household air pollution: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and burden estimation study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Nov;8(11):e1427-e1434. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30343-0.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Adamson PD. Cardiac catheterisation laboratory in a global pandemic: ceding centre stage. Heart. 2020 Oct 14:heartjnl-2020-318263. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318263.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Doris MK, Jenkins W, Robson P, Pawade T, Andrews JP, Bing R, Cartlidge T, Shah A, Pickering A, Williams MC, Fayad ZA, White A, van Beek EJ, Newby DE, Dweck MR. Computed tomography aortic valve calcium scoring for the assessment of aortic stenosis progression. Heart. 2020 Oct 5:heartjnl-2020-317125.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Dweck MR. The quest for an aortic stenosis cure. Heart. 2020 Sep 11:heartjnl-2020- 317421.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bularga A, Bing R, Shah AS, Adamson PD, Behan M, Newby DE, Flapan A, Uren N, Cruden N. Clinical outcomes following balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Open Heart. 2020 Sep;7(2):e001330. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001330
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Dweck MR, Bularga A, Hahn RT, Bing R, Lee KK, Chapman AR, White A, Salvo GD, Sade LE, Pearce K, Newby DE, Popescu BA, Donal E, Cosyns B, Edvardsen T, Mills NL, Haugaa K. Global evaluation of echocardiography in patients with COVID-19. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jun 18:jeaa178. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa178.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Singh T, Bing R, Dweck M, van Beek E, Mills N, Williams M, Villines T, Newby D, Adamson P. Exercise Electrocardiography and Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for Patients With Suspected Stable Angina Pectoris: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Randomized SCOT-HEART Trial2020 Jun 3;5(8):1-10. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1567
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Hamra M, Newby D. Cold feet, warm heart. Heart. 2020 Jul;106(13):959-1032. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316815.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Shah ASV, McAllister DA, Gallacher P, Astengo F, Perez JAR, Hall J, Lee KK, Bing R, Anand A, Nathwani D, Mills NL, Newby DE, Marwick C, Cruden NLM. Incidence, Microbiology and Outcomes in Patient Hospitalized with Infective Endocarditis. Circulation. 2020;10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044913
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R*, Gu H*, Chin C, Fang L, White A, Everett R, Spath N, Park E, Jenkins W, Shah A, Mills N, Flapan A, Chamber J, Newby D, Chowienczyk P*, Dweck M*. Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis. Heart. 2020. 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316684.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Mitchell A, Newby D. Chest pain – when in doubt….Heart. 2020 May;106(9):690- 706. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316458.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Behan M, Pessotto R, Cruden N, Northridge D. Percutaneous repair of ventricular ruptures. JACC Case Reports. 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2019.11.088.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Calin A, Mateescu A, Popescu A, Bing R, Dweck M, Popescu B. Role of advanced left ventricular imaging in adults with aortic stenosis. Heart. 2020. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019- 315211
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Meah M, Bing R, Newby D. Primacy of coronary CT angiography as the gatekeeper for the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Am Heart J. 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.01.017.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Singh T, Dweck M, Mills N, Williams M, Adamson P, Newby D. Validation of European Society of Cardiology pre-test probabilities for obstructive coronary artery disease in suspected stable angina. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2020. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa006.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Loganath K, Adamson P, Newby D, Moss A. Non-invasive imaging of high-risk coronary plaque: the role of computed tomography and positron emission tomography. Br J Radiol. 2019 Dec 18:20190740. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190740.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Dweck M. Myocardial fibrosis – why image, how to image and clinical implications. Heart. 2019. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315560
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Dweck M. Aortic valve and coronary 18F-sodium fluoride activity – a common cause? J Nucl Cardiol. 2019. doi: 10.1007/s12350-019-01901-x
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Adamson PD, Williams MC, Dweck MR, Mills NL, Boon NA, Daghem M, Bing R, Moss AJ, Mangion K, Flather M, Forbes J, Hunter A, Norrie J, Shah ASV, Timmis AD, van Beek EJR, Ahmadi AA, Leipsic J, Narula J, Newby DE, Roditi G, McAllister D, Berry C. Mechanisms of Improved Five-year Outcomes After Coronary CT Angiography in Patients with Stable Chest Pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(16):2058-70.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Moss A, Dweck M, Doris M, Andrews J, Bing R, Forsythe R, Cartlidge T, Pawade T, Daghem M, Raftis J, Williams M, van Beek E, Forsythe R, Lewis S, Lee R, Shah A, Mills N, Newby D, Adamson P. Ticagrelor to reduce myocardial injury in patients with high-risk coronary artery plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2019;10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.05.023.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Daghem M, Bing R, Dweck M, Fayad Z. Non-Invasive Imaging to Assess Atherosclerotic Plaque Composition and Disease Activity. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2019;10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.033.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Moss AJ, Doris MK, Andrews JPM, Bing R, Daghem M, van Beek EJR, Forsyth L, Shah ASV, Williams MC, Sellers S, Leipsic J, Dweck MR, Parker RA, Newby DE, Adamson PD. Molecular coronary plaque imaging using 18F-Fluoride. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Aug;12(8):e008574.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Lee KK, Stelzle D, Bing R, Anwar M, Strachan F, Bashir S, Newby DE, Shah JS, Chung MH, Bloomfield GS, Longenecker CT, Bagchi S, Kottilil S, Blach S, Razavi H, Mills PR, Mills NL, McAllister DA, Shah ASV. Global burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in hepatitis C virus infection: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30227-4.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Driessen RS, Knaapen P, Dweck MR. The clinical utility of hybrid imaging for the identification of vulnerable plaque and vulnerable patients. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019;10.1016.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Henderson J, Hunter A, Williams M, Moss A, Shah A, McAllister D, Dweck M, Newby D, Mills N, Adamson P. Clinical determinants of plasma cardiac biomarkers in patients with stable chest pain. Heart. 2019. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-314892.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Fukui M, Bing R, Dweck MD, Cavalcante J. Assessment of aortic stenosis by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Quantification of flow, characterization of myocardial injury, transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning and more. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2019 Aug;27(3):427-437. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2019.04.004.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Dweck MD. Myocardial fibrosis in classical low-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis - the missing piece of the puzzle? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 May;12(5):e009187. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009187.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Everett R, Tuck C et al. Rationale and design of the randomized, controlled Early Valve Replacement Guided by Biomarkers of Left Ventricular Decompensation in Asymptomatic Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis (EVOLVED) trial. Am Heart J. 2019 Mar 15;212:91-100. doi: 10.1016.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Cavalcante JL, Everett RJ, Clavel MA, Newby DE, Dweck MD. Imaging and impact of myocardial fibrosis in aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. Feb 2019, 12 (2) 283-296; doi: 0.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.026.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Dweck M, Bing R. Diffuse myocardial fibrosis in aortic stenosis – time to act? J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2019 Jan;12(1):120-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.06.026
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bing R, Cruden N. Risk assessment for non-cardiac surgery after coronary stenting – keeping it simple. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2019 Jan 1;5(1):1-3. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy043.
en
dc.subject
aortic stenosis
en
dc.subject
aortic valve replacement treatment
en
dc.subject
contrast-enhanced computed tomography
en
dc.subject
heart scaning
en
dc.subject
18F-GP1
en
dc.subject
18F-GP1 binding
en
dc.subject
valve stiffening
en
dc.title
Valve and the ventricle: advances in the assessment and management of aortic stenosis
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Bing2021.pdf
- Size:
- 9.41 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

