Spiritual Coping with Chronic Pain
dc.contributor.advisor
Whiteman, Martha
en
dc.contributor.author
Henderson, Kevin
en
dc.contributor.sponsor
University of Edinburgh
en
dc.date.accessioned
2009-07-27T10:17:10Z
dc.date.available
2009-07-27T10:17:10Z
dc.date.issued
2008-06-26
dc.description.abstract
Intro
The object of this study was to investigate the relationship between an individual’s spiritual beliefs and how that affected their pain in those with arthritis. It focused mainly on the coping strategies they chose and how their personality influenced this.
Method
113 people with various forms of arthritis completed a questionnaire which included scales measuring spiritual perspective (SPS), pain levels and pain interference (BPI), personality factors (Big 5 Domain), coping strategies (CSQ) and religious/spiritual (R/S) coping (RCOPE).
The resulting data was then analysed to find any correlations between the variables. Hierarchical multiple regressions were also carried out using the whole population and then only those who completed the RCOPE (n=86) with the aim of finding how the different coping strategies and personality factors affected the pain outcomes.
Results
Spiritual perspective (SP) correlated with Worst pain (WP) (p≤.05). It also accounted for significant levels of variance in WP and Pain interference (PI) (p≤.05). Despite SP correlating well with R/S coping, neither the positive nor negative R/S coping subscales accounted for any of the variance in pain outcomes. Three of the CSQ coping subscales correlated with pain outcomes: Coping self strategies (CSS), Ignoring sensations (IS) and Catastrophizing (CAT). CSS and CAT both accounted for significant levels of variance in the regression analysis using WP as the dependant variable and including the whole population. CAT was found to have the greatest independent effect upon pain outcomes in all the regression models. The personality factor Emotional stability (ES) correlated negatively with the maladaptive coping mechanisms CAT (r =-.23, p =.02) and Negative R/S coping (r =-.27, p =.01).
Discussion
Taken together, these results show that spiritual beliefs and practices and different coping strategies can have a positive or negative affect upon the pain process. Personality factors can influence the coping strategies selected, and maladaptive coping strategies are often used concurrently.
en
dc.format.extent
119956 bytes
en
dc.format.extent
122194 bytes
en
dc.format.extent
45498 bytes
en
dc.format.extent
338974 bytes
en
dc.format.mimetype
application/pdf
en
dc.format.mimetype
application/pdf
en
dc.format.mimetype
application/pdf
en
dc.format.mimetype
application/pdf
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2873
dc.language.iso
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Rosenstiel, A.K. & Keefe, F.J. 1983. Pain. 17: 33-44.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Pargament, K.I., Koenig, H.G. & Perez, L. 2000. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 56: 519-543.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Reed, P.G. 1987. Research in Nursing and Health. 10: 335-344.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Cleeland, C.S. & Ryan, K.M. 1994. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. 23(2): 129-138
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. C. 2006. Journal of Research in Personality. 40: 84-96.
en
dc.relation.references
Rippentrop, A.E. 2005. A Review of the role of religion and spirituality in chronic pain populations. Rehabilitation Psychology. 50(3): 278-284
en
dc.relation.references
Wachholtz, A.B., Pearce, M.J. & Koenig, H.G. 2007. Exploring the relationship between spirituality, coping and pain. Journal of Behavioural Medicine. 30: 311-318.
en
dc.relation.references
Vandecreek, L., Paget, S., Horton, R., Robbins, L., Oettinger, M. & Tai, K. 2004. Religious and nonreligious coping methods among persons with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 51(1): 49-55.
en
dc.subject
spirituality
en
dc.subject
coping
en
dc.subject
arthritis
en
dc.subject
personality
en
dc.title
Spiritual Coping with Chronic Pain
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Undergraduate
en
dc.type.qualificationname
Undergraduate
en
dcterms.accessRights
Restricted Access
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 4 of 4
- Name:
- pdf thesis.pdf
- Size:
- 331.03 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- only available in ed.ac.uk
- Name:
- pdf appendix 1.pdf
- Size:
- 44.43 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- only available in ed.ac.uk
- Name:
- pdf appendix 2.pdf
- Size:
- 119.33 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- only available in ed.ac.uk
- Name:
- pdf abstract.pdf
- Size:
- 117.14 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- only available in ed.ac.uk
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

