Unpicking social work practice skills: an interactional analysis of engagement and identity in a groupwork programme addressing sexual offending
dc.contributor.advisor
Kirkwood, Steve
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Whyte, Bill
en
dc.contributor.author
Mullins, Eve Louisa
en
dc.contributor.sponsor
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
en
dc.date.accessioned
2019-12-12T14:01:38Z
dc.date.available
2019-12-12T14:01:38Z
dc.date.issued
2019-11-25
dc.description.abstract
The importance of the working relationship between people who have offended
(clients) and criminal justice social workers (practitioners) as a vehicle for promoting
rehabilitation is increasingly recognised. To build and maintain effective working
relationships practitioners must demonstrate key practice skills, including empathy,
warmth and respect. Previous research has used quantitative methods
demonstrating links between aggregated categories of practitioner skills and
outcomes post intervention, and qualitative research interviews retrospectively
exploring individuals’ views of compulsory supervision or intervention. However,
this research has not clarified how these skills are demonstrated in interaction, how
they function to promote engagement or the potential micro-mechanisms of
change which contribute to rehabilitation and desistance, i.e. the cessation of
offending. To address these gaps, I used the innovative qualitative methods of
discourse analysis and conversation analysis to examine what happens when
practitioners and clients talk to each other, what happens in the ‘black box’.
I analysed video-recordings of twelve groupwork sessions from the groupwork
programme for addressing sexual offending in Scotland, ‘Moving Forward: Making
Changes’. This rolling programme works with adult men convicted of sexual
offences, legally compelled to attend. Five practitioners and eighteen clients
participated in the study. I transcribed and analysed the video recordings in detail
using discourse analysis, specifically discursive psychology, and conversation
analysis. These methods enable a micro-level examination of the talk-in-interaction,
to consider what people are doing in their talk and how they are doing it, e.g. how
practitioners demonstrate empathy. In the analysis I demonstrated the tacit practice skills of empathy, warmth and
respect are evident in talk as actions that maintain co-operation in interaction and
build solidarity; i.e. managing face, handling epistemic authority and facilitating
empathic communion. I further outlined some of the conversational resources
practitioners used to ‘do’ these actions, promoting engagement whilst pursuing
institutional goals. Through this talk, practitioners shape and direct how clients tell
the story of who they are, although clients can resist this. In this way clients’
narrative identities were actively and collaboratively constructed and negotiated in
the talk-in-interaction. Aspects of identity considered to promote desistance, e.g.
presenting a good core self or a situational account for offending, were presented,
encouraged, developed and attributed. Talk about risk also contributed to the
construction and negotiation of clients’ identities. Practitioners and clients expected
clients to demonstrate they are aware of and attending to the risks around their
behaviour, highlighting risk discourse as central. Risk in this sense was used
discursively to demonstrate change and agency over the future, establishing a nonoffending
self. However, risk talk could challenge clients’ self-image and threaten
ongoing engagement.
This study highlights the suitability of discourse analysis and conversation analysis
to access the ‘black box’ of criminal justice social work intervention. Routine and
common-sense practice skills were made visible, making these more accessible to
practitioners to reflect on and develop more responsive and reflexive practice.
Finally, criminal justice social work interventions are sites where clients’ narrative
identities are constructed, as such potential sites for developing non-offending
identities. This study highlights this process is inherently and necessarily relational.
In developing forward looking self-stories, which encapsulated features of
desistance and risk, narratives of rehabilitation were constructed at the interface of
the client and the institution.
en
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/1842/36611
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
criminal justice social workers
en
dc.subject
sexual offencers
en
dc.subject
groupwork programmes
en
dc.subject
working relationships
en
dc.subject
empathy
en
dc.subject
reducing reoffending
en
dc.subject
conversation analysis
en
dc.subject
Moving Forwards programme
en
dc.subject
self-image
en
dc.subject
risk
en
dc.title
Unpicking social work practice skills: an interactional analysis of engagement and identity in a groupwork programme addressing sexual offending
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Mullins2019.pdf
- Size:
- 2.33 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

