Role of the Court of Final Appeal of the Hong Kong special administrative region under China's "one country, two systems" principle
dc.contributor.advisor
Himsworth, Chris
en
dc.contributor.author
Wang, Wanli
en
dc.date.accessioned
2016-02-04T16:42:42Z
dc.date.available
2016-02-04T16:42:42Z
dc.date.issued
2011
dc.description.abstract
This thesis examines the constitutional performance of Hong Kong’s Court of Final
Appeal (the CFA or the Court), and explores the appropriate role it should play in
Hong Kong’s new constitutional order defined by China’s “one country, two systems”
principle. It includes a wider discussion of China’s political and constitutional
structure within which the Court’s operational context is defined, a consideration of
the legitimate role of senior courts, and an investigation of relevant UK and EU
constitutional practices. It evaluates the Court’s part, inter alia, in constitutional
judicial review, the interpretation of the Hong Kong Basic Law, human rights
protection, and the resulting constitutional and political implications.
The Court’s role mirrors questions in relation not only to the internal political and
legal order of Hong Kong itself but also to the broader constitutional order as to the
central-regional relationship in China. It is the only institutional connection between
Hong Kong’s common law legal system and Mainland China’s communist civil law
system. When exercising its power of constitutional review and Basic Law
interpretation, the Court faces dilemmas and sensitive situations, in which it has to
handle with care the relationships between individual freedoms and collective good,
judicial independence and executive efficiency, judicial scrutiny and legislative
authority, regional interests and national concerns, the region’s autonomy and the
centre’s power. A tendency of judicial supremacy emerges in post- handover Hong
Kong, with profound implications for Hong Kong’s political life. While playing a
significant role in human rights protection, the maintenance of good governance, and
the achievements in constitutionalism and the rule of law in Hong Kong, the Court
may also make some positive contributions to Mainland China’s own development in
these areas. It is suggested that the Court adopt a modest and restrained approach in
deciding politically sensitive constitutional questions, defining itself not only as a
regional supreme court safeguarding Hong Kong’s autonomy but also as a national
court protecting sovereign interests. A relationship of coordination, reciprocity,
mutual trust and mutual respect between Hong Kong and the Central Government,
and between Hong Kong courts (the CFA in particular) and other Hong Kong
institutions should be built.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/14204
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
International Law
en
dc.title
Role of the Court of Final Appeal of the Hong Kong special administrative region under China's "one country, two systems" principle
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Wang2011.pdf
- Size:
- 1.24 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

