Pop cinema: aesthetic conversations between art and the moving-image
dc.contributor.advisor
Davis, Glyn
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Allmer, Patricia
en
dc.contributor.author
Day, Thomas
en
dc.contributor.sponsor
other
en
dc.date.accessioned
2020-06-16T11:27:11Z
dc.date.available
2020-06-16T11:27:11Z
dc.date.issued
2020-07-02
dc.description.abstract
This dissertation seeks to recover a seemingly lost story in the history of experimental
cinema: its relationship to Pop Art. Although both Pop Art and non-narrative
filmmaking have received significant scholarly attention, there has not been a
sustained attempt to probe theoretically the link between these two areas of cultural
production. This work is the first study to attempt to understand historically and
theoretically the relationship between the fine art practice of Pop and the production
of non-narrative experimental cinema. It posits that works of experimental cinema
exist that not only bear resemblances to central examples of fine art Pop but may be
labelled works of Pop Art in their own right.
To make the case for such works, this dissertation is split into four main chapters. The
first offers an overview of the history of the phrase ‘Pop Cinema’ and traces its usage
in a variety of discourses in critical, journalistic and academic discussions of
mainstream and experimental film practice throughout the second half of the 20th
century. In the subsequent chapters, case study films are presented as works of Pop
Cinema, observed in relation to discourses on Pop Art found in art historical
scholarship. Each work is shown to be a Pop Film not only because of its engagement
with a subject of mass and consumer culture, but also the way in which such material
is rendered on screen through medium-specific manipulation of film language and the
foregrounding of cinematic technologies and techniques.
In Chapter Two, I uncover the Pop aesthetic beginning in the 1950s with William
Klein’s ‘city symphony’ film Broadway by Light (1958), arguing that the film is the
urtext of Pop Cinema, fusing an intermedial exploration of stillness and movement
with an ambivalence towards its subject: the advertising light signs of Manhattan’s
Times Square. Following this, I discuss artworks and films created by the British artist Jeff Keen. Here the notion of collage as both an artistic methodology and formative
medium for the dissemination of Pop Art are examined in relation to Keen’s 1966 film
Flik Flak. Through in-depth analysis of Keen’s work, I draw attention to his distinct
mode of collage filmmaking, arguing that it seeks to intervene and comment on the
media-saturated environment of the 1960s in both humourous and poltical ways.
Finally, I look towards Pop Art’s interaction with Minimalism using the work of German
artist Peter Roehr. Taking Roher’s Film Montages (I-III) (1965) as my central object
of focus I explore how Roehr developed strategies of seriality and repetition that can
be seen in concert with Pop artists like Andy Warhol. Ultimately, through these
examples and through my wide contextualising discussion, I illuminate ways of seeing
a variety of filmmaking from the 1950s onward as Pop Art and I offer new dimensions
of intermedial understanding to the practice of non-narrative cinema in relation to Art
History.
en
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/1842/37131
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/432
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
Pop Art
en
dc.subject
experimenal film
en
dc.subject
intermediality
en
dc.subject
Avan-Garde film
en
dc.subject
video art
en
dc.subject
art history
en
dc.subject
moving-image art
en
dc.title
Pop cinema: aesthetic conversations between art and the moving-image
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Day2020.pdf
- Size:
- 4.24 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

