Memory and normal ageing in adults with intellectual disabilities: a research portfolio
Files
Item Status
Embargo End Date
Date
Authors
McPaul, Ann
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Assessment of dementia in adults with intellectual disabilities
poses specific challenges. Firstly, there is a paucity of validated, standardised
and appropriate neuropsychological assessments of memory for adults with
intellectual disabilities. Secondly, there are difficulties determining whether
performance on neuropsychological assessments are attributable to preexisting
intellectual disabilities, ‘normal’ ageing or part of a dementing
process. A systematic review was therefore carried out to examine if there
are memory changes associated with ‘normal’ ageing in the Down syndrome
population. Following this an exploratory empirical research project was
undertaken to examine one aspect of construct validity (i.e. convergent
validity) of an associative memory test in a sample of adults with intellectual
disabilities. This research project is presented as a journal article titled
‘Convergent validity of the Visual Association Test (VAT) in adults with
intellectual disabilities’.
METHODS:
40 participants aged between 18-45 years were recruited from
Community Learning Disability Teams. Participants completed the VAT and
subtests of the modified Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG-DS).
IQ was assessed using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition
(WAIS-IV). Correlational analysis of the test variables were carried out.
Participants with a diagnosis of dementia were excluded from the study.
RESULTS:
All participants performed well on the VAT irrespective of age,
gender or IQ. It was well received by participants. No significant correlations
were found between the VAT and the subtests of the CAMCOG-DS or with
the subtests of the WAIS-IV. Therefore, there was no evidence of convergent
validity with this test in this sample of participants.
CONCLUSIONS:
While the VAT was found to be an easy, quick test to use with
people with intellectual disabilities and all participants scored above ‘floor’
level, it was not found to have convergent validity with the CAMCOG-DS.
Further research is needed to determine if the VAT represents a useful tool
for assessment with this population.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

