Remaining rooted whilst branching out: an investigation of rules and principles in decision-making
dc.contributor.advisor
Laurie, Graeme
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Porter, Gerard
en
dc.contributor.author
Sethi, Nayha
en
dc.contributor.sponsor
other
en
dc.date.accessioned
2017-06-13T10:54:09Z
dc.date.available
2017-06-13T10:54:09Z
dc.date.issued
2016-11-24
dc.description.abstract
Against the backdrop of health research regulation, this work engages in an
exploration of, and offers suggestions towards, how the decision maker can negotiate
the complex path of the difficult decision. It is argued that whilst rules and principles
are heavily relied upon in order to determine what to do, this reliance takes place
without adequate reflection of the different ways in which we seek to rely upon these
decision-making aids. What is most often the topic of analysis is the content which
rules and principles carry rather than consideration of the different functions which
each can fulfil or their (un)suitability in helping the decision maker.
Before we consider which principles or rules should inform our decisions, we need to
understand why we are using rules and principles. It follows that in order to
understand why we might use rules and principles, we must understand how rules
and principles can actually help us to reach decisions.
Through the development and refinement of a conceptual tree, this thesis sheds light
on the how and the why, in order to help decision makers determine the which.
Through the metaphor of a continuum, additional insights are offered on the
interrelationships that might co-exist between rules and principles.
This thesis begins by offering an analysis of pre-existing understandings of rules and
principles from legal theory and bioethics literatures. Additionally, I consider the
implications of principle-centric and rule-centric approaches to decision-making.
Through the overarching metaphor of a tree, a conceptualisation of best practice
instantiations, which represent a helpful middle-ground between rules and principles
is also offered. This can provide significant practical support to the decision maker in
navigating the path of the difficult decision.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/22043
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Nayha Sethi and Graeme Laurie, 'Towards Principles-Based Approaches to Governance of Health-Related Research Using Personal Data”, (2013) 1 European Journal of Risk Regulation (2013), pp. 43-57;
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Nayha Sethi, Graeme Laurie “Delivering proportionate governance in the era of eHealth: Making linkage and privacy work together”, 13 Medical Law International (2013)
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Nayha Sethi “The Promotion of Data Sharing in Pharmacoepidemiology”, 21 European Journal of Health Law, (2014), pp. 271-296
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Nayha Sethi, “Reimagining Regulatory Approaches: On the Essential Role of Principles in Health Research Regulation", 12 SCRIPTed (2015), pp. 91-116.
en
dc.subject
rules
en
dc.subject
principles
en
dc.subject
best practice
en
dc.subject
decision-making
en
dc.subject
bioethics
en
dc.title
Remaining rooted whilst branching out: an investigation of rules and principles in decision-making
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

