Cognitive justice, plurinational constitutionalism and post-colonial peacebuilding
Abstract
Several problems disquieting the developing world render the post-colonial state
unstable, with recurrent, often violent conflict. The seeming incurable vulnerability
of the nation-state construct reflects inherent problems in its basic constitutional
philosophy for managing diverse identities in the global South. It suggests an
incapacity for equality and justice, undermining the moral legitimacy of the
colonial-state model. This is illustrated using Central Nigeria or Nigeria’s ‘Middle-
Belt’ through numerous identities, largely veiled in non-recognition and
misrecognition by the colonial and post-colonial state and its conflicts. The baggage
of colonialism stalks the developing world through unjust socio-political orders.
Therefore, the post-colonial liberal constitution (using Nigeria’s 1999 Federal
Constitution) and mechanisms it imbibes for managing diversity
(Consociationalism, Federalism/Federal Character, Human Rights, Citizenship), is
exposed to be seriously misconceived epistemically and cartographically. I argue
that effective peacebuilding in the global South is impossible without Cognitive
Justice, which is 'the equal treatment of different forms of knowledge and knowers,
of identities’. I articulate a political constitutional philosophy grounded upon
Cognitive Justice as a conception of justice, advancing normative and conceptual
frameworks for just post-colonial orders. This provides foundations for a proposed
reconceptualisation and restructuring of the institutional and structural make-up of
the post-colonial state through a ground-up constitution remaking process, for new
orders beyond colonially stipulated delimitations. In search of appropriate
constitutional designs, I engage Multiculturalism, National Pluralism and
Plurinational State scholarship by Western Political Philosophers and Constitutional
Theorists (Kymlicka, Taylor, Tully, Keating, Tierney, Norman, Anderson, and
Requejo etc), as they address particularly the UK, Canadian and Spanish cases, as
well as Awolowo’s philosophies. I also engage recent plurinational constitutional
designs operational in Ecuador and Bolivia, and propose that the latter hold more
appropriate conceptual and structural pointers for effective peacebuilding in the
troubled, pluralist global South.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

