Inferring personhood through funerary evidence in Late Prehistoric Southeastern Iberia (3200-1500 BC)
item.page.access-rights
item.page.embargodate
Data
Autores
Díaz de Liaño Del Valle, Guillermo
Resumo
This work explores, through the theoretical analysis of funerary evidence, notions of
personhood during the Chalcolithic and the Early and Middle Bronze Age (3200-1500 BC) in
the Southeast of the Iberian Peninsula.
In order to infer the main features of personhood, this work assembles a theoretical
framework, based on the work of the theoretical archaeologist Almudena Hernando, combined
with elements from the work of Charles Taylor, John Chapman, and several concepts from the
Anthropology of Personhood. This theoretical framework allows to explore the general
characterisation of personhood, mainly through the gradient individuality-relationality and the
notions of partibility and permeability, but also explores the perception of the self in relation
to non-human entities, the stances of the self toward other human beings, and the main ways
of conceptualising, representing, and experiencing reality. The need for this framework is
predicted on the principle of prehistoric personhood being radically different from
contemporary Western notions of personhood, and thus being necessary to study it on its own.
It is also based on the idea that simplistic, unilinear models of personhood where this trait
moves from relationality towards individualism fail to acknowledge its complexity.
The results of this work suggest that personhood in the Chalcolithic was fundamentally
relational, despite the appearance of incipient individuality, with partibility being an important
feature and that non-human entities played an important part in the constitution of personhood.
Moreover, it is likely that personhood was not exclusive of human beings, and that it was at
least partially extended to non-human entities such as certain objects and ancestors. With the
arrival of the Argaric Bronze Age, and still within a fundamentally relational personhood,
individuality increased remarkably. However, this process of individualisation did not affect
equally all groups within Argaric society, and while it seems that the elites became more
individualised, there is clear evidence of widespread resilience practices.
Both partibility and
non-human personhood continued existing, although not in the exact same way, and
permeability became an important trait of Argaric personhood. Finally, this work connects
personhood with how humans relate to the world, exploring how personhood affects the way
people engage with other human and non-human entities, as well as how reality itself could
have been perceived, conceptualised and experienced in connection with the available features
of personhood.

