Variable capture levels of carbon dioxide from natural gas combined cycle power plant with integrated post-combustion capture in low carbon electricity markets
Files
Item Status
Embargo End Date
Date
Authors
Abstract
This work considers the value of flexible power provision from natural gas-fired
combined cycle (NGCC) power plants operating post-combustion carbon dioxide
(CO2) capture in low carbon electricity markets. Specifically, the work assesses the
value of the flexibility gained by varying CO2 capture levels, thus the specific energy
penalty of capture and the resultant power plant net electricity export. The potential
value of this flexible operation is quantified under different electricity market
scenarios, given the corresponding variations in electricity export and CO2 emissions.
A quantified assessment of natural gas-fired power plant integrated with amine-based
post-combustion capture and compression is attempted through the development of
an Aspen Plus simulation. To enable evaluation of flexible operation, the simulation
was developed with the facility to model off-design behaviour in the steam cycle,
amine capture unit and CO2 compression train. The simulation is ultimately used to
determine relationships between CO2 capture level and the total specific electricity
output penalty (EOP) of capture for different plant configurations. Based on this
relationship, a novel methodology for maximising net plant income by optimising the
operating capture level is proposed and evaluated. This methodology provides an
optimisation approach for power plant operators given electricity market stimuli,
namely electricity prices, fuel prices, and carbon reduction incentives.
The techno-economic implications of capture level optimisation are considered in
three different low carbon electricity market case studies; 1) a CO2 price operating in
parallel to wholesale electricity selling prices, 2) a proportional subsidy for low carbon
electricity considered to be the fraction of plant electrical output equal to the capture
level, and 3) a subsidy for low carbon electricity based upon a counterfactual for net
plant CO2 emissions (similar to typical approaches for implementing an Emissions
Performance Standard). The incentives for variable capture levels are assessed in
each market study, with the value of optimum capture level operation quantified for
both plant operators and to the wider electricity market. All market case studies
indicate that variable capture is likely to increase plant revenue throughout the range
of market prices considered. Different market approaches, however, lead to different
valuation of flexible power provision and therefore different operating outcomes.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

