View of eighteenth century society in the the novels of Tobias Smollett
dc.contributor.author
Ross, Ian C.
en
dc.date.accessioned
2016-11-09T10:28:58Z
dc.date.available
2016-11-09T10:28:58Z
dc.date.issued
1975
dc.description.abstract
The five novels of Tobias Smollett are the
greatest achievement of a man whose literary output,
like that of many of his contemporaries, was prodigious
both in quantity and variety. Despite an improvement
in recent years (most remarkably in P-C Douce's Les
Romans de Smollett : 1971), Smollett's fiction remains
comparatively neglected by students of English literature. Whilst literary historians perpetuate old errors
and misconceptions of the nature of Smollett's work,
other critics create new myths, both social and literary -
of Radical Dr. Smollett or Smollett the Picaresque
Novelist, for example. The picaresque nature of Smollett's fiction has long been a stumbling block for
critics who either regard the term as meaning no more
than episodic and roguish, or who, correctly rejecting
such a facile and.misleading approach, decide that we
cannot under any circumstances describe Smollett's
novels as "picaresque". By examining Spanish picaresque fiction both as a literary form and as a social
document, we find that its particularly successful
fusion of form and content lead to a powerful and
important vision of a society during a period of
fundamental social change. Turning again to Smollett's
work we see that the author adopts the literary
structure of the Spanish "novelas picarescas" not
(as some critics appear to believe) because he was
unable to think of anything better, but in the belief
that the picaresque novel form was uniquely appropriate
as a means of translating his pessimistic vision of
eighteenth century society into fictional terms.Writing during a period which saw the traditional
social, economic and political influence of the landed
gentry decline as the commercial interests of the
bourgeoisie gained in importance, Smollett was personally in a perplexing social position. Though concerned to uphold his status as a "gentleman", which
separated him from his social inferiors, he was also -
as a younger son - obliged to earn his own living
away from the privileged atmosphere of the country
estate. It is both from his personal experience and
from his distaste for a society which placed money
above morality, that Smollett's advocacy of the values
of the landed gentry, and his distaste for those of
the newly rich middle classes derive. Though he could
not remain unaffected by his years of historical,
social and political writing, Smollett's defence of
an (idealized) traditional, land-based society remains
paramount throughout his fiction. Though he abandoned
the picaresque novel form after Roderick Random and
Peregrine Pickle, his work reflects an attempt to
find a new fictional form for his conservative vision
which - after partially unsuccessful attempts in
Ferdinand Count Fathom and Sir Launcelot Greaves -
he finally achieved in his last, best and most humane
novel Humphry Clinker. It is both Smollett's literary
achievement and the nature of his social vision which
are discussed here.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/17826
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.ispartof
Annexe Thesis Digitisation Project 2016 Block 4
en
dc.relation.isreferencedby
en
dc.title
View of eighteenth century society in the the novels of Tobias Smollett
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- RossIC_1975redux.pdf
- Size:
- 56.94 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

