Multi-level governance revisited: comparing the strategies of interest representation of legislative regions in EU environmental policy-making
dc.contributor.advisor
Jeffery, Charlie
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Swenden, Wilfried
en
dc.contributor.author
Högenauer, Anna-Lena
en
dc.contributor.sponsor
Graduate School of Social and Political Science of the University of Edinburgh
en
dc.date.accessioned
2011-10-03T13:51:23Z
dc.date.available
2011-10-03T13:51:23Z
dc.date.issued
2011-07-04
dc.description.abstract
Since the 1980s, regions have taken a strong interest in EU policy-making and
increasingly demanded representation in the process. This has given rise to the
concept of multi-level governance (MLG) in EU policy-making, which stipulates that
subnational and supranational actors will interact and thus to some extent erode the
authority of central governments. However, due to the scarcity of case study research
looking at concrete instances of policy-making, a number of questions remain about
the extent and the effectiveness of the interaction between regional governments and
European actors. In addition, the extent and origins of differences in regional activity
across regions and member states remain unclear.
This thesis aims to contribute to the MLG debate by developing a theoretical
framework with a set of hypotheses about regional activism in EU policy-making on
the basis of rational choice institutionalist assumptions. It then investigates how
seven legislative regions from four member states (the UK, Germany, Belgium and
Austria) represent their interests in two concrete instances of EU policy-making and
tests the core hypotheses against these fourteen cases.
The thesis contributes to the MLG debate in three ways. Firstly, the principal
objective of the thesis is to analyse the impact of different types of domestic
intergovernmental relations on the strategies of regions at the European level. It is
argued that the level and nature of a region's activity on the European level depends
on the opportunities for influence in the domestic European policy-making process
and the constraints that domestic rules place on European level activity. Secondly, a
number of factors that could account for different levels of regional activity both
within and between states are analysed. Domestic conflict and the capacity of a
region are found to be particularly relevant for regional mobilisation. Finally, the
thesis discusses the relative importance of domestic channels compared to European
channels of regional interest representation, thus addressing one of the fundamental
questions in the MLG literature. It is argued that unmediated interaction between
European actors and regional governments is less common than predicted by the MLG literature, but that it can be effective, especially in cases where regions devise
a comprehensive strategy of interest representation.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/5512
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Högenauer A.-L. (2008), “The Impact of the Lisbon Reform Treaty on Regional Engagement in EU Policy-Making - Continuity or Change?”, European Journal of Law Reform, Vol. X, No. 4, pp. 535-555.
en
dc.subject
multi-level governance
en
dc.subject
Europeanization
en
dc.subject
EU policy-making
en
dc.subject
regions
en
dc.subject
federalism
en
dc.title
Multi-level governance revisited: comparing the strategies of interest representation of legislative regions in EU environmental policy-making
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Hogenauer2011.pdf
- Size:
- 2.34 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

