Late-life depression : a systematic review of meta-analyses and a meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive behavioural therapy in older adults with co-morbid physical illness
dc.contributor.advisor
Mckenzie, Karen
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Cossar, Jill
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Laidlaw, Kenneth
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Lorimer, Angus
en
dc.contributor.author
Huxtable, David
en
dc.date.accessioned
2013-10-17T14:40:06Z
dc.date.available
2013-10-17T14:40:06Z
dc.date.issued
2013-07-02
dc.description.abstract
Aims: To examine the efficacy of CBT for late-life depression in older adults with co-morbid physical
illness and to review what has been revealed by meta-analytic studies with regards moderators of
treatment in psychological approaches for late-life depression.
Method: Systematic literature search and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCT)
evaluating CBT for depression in older adults with co-morbid physical illness and systematic review
of meta-analyses examining psychological therapies for late-life depression.
Results: Nine papers met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. CBT was superior to waiting list and
treatment as usual control conditions, showing a statistically significant pooled standardised mean
difference (SMD) of 0.63 (95 per cent CI, 0.29 to 0.97, p = 0.0003). This was largely maintained at
follow up (SMD 0.5, 95 per cent CI, 0.08 to 0.92). Sensitivity analysis showed individual CBT yielded a
large, statistically significant summary effect size of 0.80 (95 per cent CI, 0.45 to 1.16), but that group
CBT did not show statistical superiority over controls. Clinician-rated measures of depression yielded
larger effect sizes, with a SMD of 1.57 (95 per cent CI, 0.56 to 2.59, p = 0.002) as compared with patientrated
measures: 1.03 (95 per cent CI, 0.75 to 1.31, p = 0.0001).
Fourteen meta-analyses met inclusion criteria for systematic review. More recent publication was
significantly correlated with increased reporting quality and reduced analysis of moderating factors.
Duration of treatment, treatment setting and gender of participants showed no moderating impact on
outcome. Depression severity, participant age, treatment modality, and study quality showed no
consistent relationship with outcomes. Active or placebo controls were associated with reduced effect
sizes when compared with no treatment or waiting list controls. Patient-rated outcome measures
were associated with reduced effect sizes as compared with clinician-rated measures.
Conclusions: When compared with treatment as usual and waiting list controls Individual CBT is
effective in reducing depressive symptoms for depressed older adults with an underlying physical
illness. Meta-analytic studies of late-life depression show variable results regarding moderators of
treatment efficacy. More high quality studies examining the effectiveness of psychological therapies
are needed with clinically representative older populations, particularly, the older-old and those with
co-morbid physical illnesses.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/7915
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
older adult depression
en
dc.subject
depression
en
dc.subject
meta analysis
en
dc.subject
CBT
en
dc.subject
physical illness
en
dc.title
Late-life depression : a systematic review of meta-analyses and a meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive behavioural therapy in older adults with co-morbid physical illness
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
DClinPsychol Doctor of Clinical Psychology
en
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

