RNA editing and autophagy in Drosophila melanogaster
dc.contributor.advisor
O'Connell, Mary
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Pennetta, Giuseppa
en
dc.contributor.author
Paro, Simona
en
dc.contributor.sponsor
Medical Research Council (MRC)
en
dc.date.accessioned
2013-12-10T10:11:40Z
dc.date.available
2013-12-10T10:11:40Z
dc.date.issued
2012-11-30
dc.description.abstract
Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression involves a diverse set of
mechanisms such as RNA splicing, RNA localization, and RNA turn-over.
Adenosine to Inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is an additional post-transcriptional
regulatory mechanism. Temporally, it occurs after transcription and before RNA
splicing and has been shown in some instances to possibly modulate alternative
splicing events. This is the case for example, with the pre-mRNA encoding the GluR-
2 subunit of AMPA receptor, a glutamate-activated ion channel.
ADAR (Adenosine deaminase acting on RNA) proteins bind to double-stranded
regions in pre-messenger RNAs. They deaminate specific adenosines, generating
inosines; if the editing event occurs within the coding region, inosine is then
interpreted as guanosine by the ribosomal translational machinery, changing codon
meaning. These editing events can increase the repertoire of translated proteins,
generating molecular diversity and modifying protein function.
In mammals there are four ADAR genes: ADAR1, ADAR2, ADAR3 and TENR.
ADAR3 and TENR are enzymatically inactive. All the proteins have two types of
functional domains: (i) the catalytic deaminase domain at the carboxyl-terminus and
(ii) the double stranded RNA binding domains, dsRBDs, at the amino terminus.
ADAR1 and ADAR2 differ significantly at the amino terminus, by the number of the
dsRNA binding domains (three and two dsRBDs for ADAR1 and ADAR2 protein,
respectively). The differences observed between ADAR1 and ADAR2 are likely to
reflect the different repertoires of substrates edited by these two enzymes.
Data concerning the conservation of Adar genes throughout evolution suggest that
Drosophila melanogaster has a unique Adar gene which is a true ortholog of human
ADAR2 rather than an invertebrate gene ancestral for both vertebrate genes. Flies that
are null mutants for Adar (Adar5G1 mutants) display profound behavioral and
locomotive deficits. Impairment in motor activity of the mutants is succeeded by age-dependent
neurodegeneration, characterized by swelling within the Adar-null mutant
fly brain. The initial focus of my thesis was to elucidate what causes Adar mutant phenotypes
or, whether it is possible, to suppress them. I took advantage of Drosophila genetics
to establish a forward genetic screen for suppressors of reduced Adar5G1 viability
which is approximately 20-30% in comparison to control flies at eclosion. The
results from an interaction screen on Chromosome 2L were further confirmed using
Exelixis P-element insertion lines. The screen revealed that decreasing Tor (Target
of rapamycin) expression suppresses Adar mutant phenotypes.
TOR plays a role in maintaining cellular homeostasis by balancing the metabolic
processes. It controls anabolic events by phosphorylating eukaryotic translation
initiation factor 4E-binding protein (4E-BP) and p70 S6 kinase (S6K) and inducing
cap-mediated translation. However, different types of stress, signals or increased
demand in catabolic processes, converge to reduce TOR enzymatic activity. This
results in long-lived proteins and organelles being engulfed in double-membrane
vesicles and degraded; this bulk degradation process is called (macro)autophagy.
The second aim of my thesis was to clarify which pathway, downstream to TOR, was
responsible for the suppression of Adar-null phenotypes. I mimicked the effect of
reduced Tor expression by manipulating genetically the cap-dependent translation
and the autophagy pathways. Interestingly, boosting the expression of Atg
(autophagy specific genes) genes, such as, Atg1 and Atg5, thereby increasing the
activation rate of the autophagy pathway, suppresses Adar5G1 phenotypes. Finally, I
found that Adar5G1 mutant flies have an increased level of autophagy that is
observable from the larval stage.
I investigated possible stresses affecting our mutants; Adar-mutant larval fat cells
show ER stress triggering an unfolded protein response as indicated by expression of
XbpI-eGFP reporter. Thus, ER stress might induce increased autophagy and it can
lead to locomotive impairments and neurodegeneration in Adar-null mutants. These
results suggest a function for the Adar gene in regulating cellular stress.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/8254
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Hogg, M., Paro, S., Keegan, L.P., and O'Connell, M.A. (2011). RNA editing by mammalian ADARs. Adv Genet 73, 87-120.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Keegan, L.P., McGurk, L., Palavicini, J.P., Brindle, J., Paro, S., Li, X., Rosenthal, J.J., and O'Connell, M.A. (2011). Functional conservation in human and Drosophila of Metazoan ADAR2 involved in RNA editing: loss of ADAR1 in insects. Nucleic Acids Res 39, 7249-7262
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Marcucci, R., Brindle, J., Paro, S., Casadio, A., Hempel, S., Morrice, N., Bisso, A., Keegan, L.P., Del Sal, G., and O'Connell, M.A. (2011). Pin1 and WWP2 regulate GluR2 Q/R site RNA editing by ADAR2 with opposing effects. EMBO J.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Paro, S., Li, X., O'Connell, M.A., and Keegan, L.P. (2011). Regulation and Functions of ADAR in Drosophila. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol.
en
dc.subject
RNA editing
en
dc.subject
autophagy
en
dc.title
RNA editing and autophagy in Drosophila melanogaster
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Paro2012.pdf
- Size:
- 60.12 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

