Logical ambiguity
dc.contributor.author
Emms, Martin Thomas
en
dc.date.accessioned
2018-01-31T11:20:09Z
dc.date.available
2018-01-31T11:20:09Z
dc.date.issued
1995
dc.description.abstract
en
dc.description.abstract
The thesis presents research in the field of model theoretic semantics on the problem of ambiguity,
especially as it arises for sentences that contain junctions (and,or) and quantifiers (every man,
a woman). A number of techniques that have been proposed are surveyed, and I conclude
that these ought to be rejected because they do not make ambiguity 'emergent': they all have
the feature that subtheories would be able to explain all syntactic facts yet would predict no
ambiguity. In other words these accounts have a special purpose mechanism for generating
ambiguities.
en
dc.description.abstract
It is argued that categorial grammars show promise for giving an 'emergent' account. This is
because the only way to take a subtheory of a particular categorial grammar is by changing one
of the small number of clauses by which the categorial grammar axiomatises an infinite set of
syntactic rules, and such a change is likely to have a wider range of effects on the coverage of
the grammar than simply the subtraction of ambiguity.
en
dc.description.abstract
Of categorial grammars proposed to date the most powerful is Lambek Categorial Grammar,
which defines the set of syntactic rules by a notational variant of Gentzen's sequent calculus
for implicational propositional logic, and which defines meaning assignment by using the Curry-
Howard isomorphism between Natural Deduction proofs in implicational propositional logic and
terms of typed lambda calculus. It is shown that no satisfactory account of the junctions and
quantifiers is possible in Lambek categorial grammar.
en
dc.description.abstract
I introduce then a framework that I call Polymorphic Lambek Categorial Grammar, which adds
variables and their universal quantification, to the language of categorisation. The set of syntac¬
tic rules is specified by a notational variant of Gentzen's sequent calculus for quantified proposi¬
tional logic, and which defines meaning assignment by using Girard's Extended Curry-Howard
isomorphism between Natural Deduction proofs in quantified implicational propositional logic
and terms of 2nd order polymorphic lambda calculus. It is shown that this allows an account
of the junctions and quantifiers, and one which is 'emerge
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/26487
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.ispartof
Annexe Thesis Digitisation Project 2017 Block 15
en
dc.relation.isreferencedby
Already catalogued
en
dc.title
Logical ambiguity
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- EmmsMT_1995redux.pdf
- Size:
- 47.56 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

