Edinburgh Research Archive

Justice as a point of equipoise: an Aristotelian approach to contemporary corporate ethics

dc.contributor.advisor
Scaltsas, Dory
dc.contributor.advisor
Megone, Chris
dc.contributor.advisor
Phemister, Pauline
dc.contributor.author
Kelly, Owen
dc.date.accessioned
2023-01-25T11:14:57Z
dc.date.available
2023-01-25T11:14:57Z
dc.date.issued
2023-01-25
dc.description.abstract
How can contemporary companies and corporations, necessarily operating within market-derived norms, act justly in their dealings? Why should they care about doing so? I claim in this thesis that Aristotle’s conception of general justice provides an answer to these questions and, claiming the necessity of justice to all ethical deliberation, I propose it as a practicable foundation for the such organizations’ ethics. I argue that Aristotle’s eudaimonic metaphysics can plausibly be brought to bear on contemporary dilemmas in corporate ethics; and that his particularist approach to ethical deliberation justifies a conception of justice as a point of equipoise, found along several dimensions, always evanescent and demanding of constant attention. Acknowledging the dominance of deontological and utilitarian thinking in contemporary business ethics, I propose an Aristotelian, eudaimonic approach which rests on his teleology and the place of virtue within it. I argue for the primacy of justice as an ethical concern and claim that Aristotle’s conception of general (as opposed to particular) justice provides a plausible basis for creating a justice-based corporate ethic. I claim that Aristotelian general justice is analogous to the ancient concept of dikaiosyne , which can be loosely translated into vernacular English as ‘doing the right thing’. In chapter 1, I outline the problem I am seeking to address, namely the proliferation of conceptions of justice with which contemporary companies and corporations are expected to deal. I identify two dominant strands of thinking, roughly corresponding to the ‘left’ and the ‘right’ in post-French Revolution politics, positing Rawls and Hayek, respectively, as representatives of these traditions. I place companies and corporations within the context of the market – based theories and conventions that underpin contemporary capitalism. In Chapter 2, I introduce Aristotle’s teleology and the metaphysics from which he derives his approach to justice. Following his metaphysics, I argue that justice is an ineradicable concern for human beings if they are to have a chance of living a eudaimonic life; and that collective entities such as companies and corporations can partake of these metaphysics, because of the relationship between the collective and the individual. In chapter 3, I summarize Aristotle’s approach to justice and propose an interpretation of Aristotelian general justice as a point of equipoise, balanced along many dimensions, and, drawing on his Doctrine of the Mean, consisting in a ‘mean of means’. I argue that general justice is the whole of virtue and that it can be conceptualized in a way that can support ethical deliberations in contemporary companies and corporations. In chapter 4, I examine the ways in which justice can be considered in the light of modern schematics of justice, and how this takes place in companies and corporations. I consider the dominant concerns that need to be addressed by any plausible approach to justice in contemporary market economies, such as desert and inequality; and propose ways of considering aspects of contemporary corporate life, such as investments and profits, in terms of Aristotelian general justice. In chapter 5, I consider six intuitively obvious objections to my thesis, namely: that globalization, financialization and the advent of the internet have, respectively and in different ways, rendered it anachronistic; that companies and corporations have no counterparts in the Ancient World, as they are products of industrial capitalism; that the setting for Aristotle’s philosophy, the Ancient Greek polis, is irrelevant to modern life; and that Aristotle’s character-based ethics are elitist and therefore incompatible with contemporary meritocratic norms. I conclude with some practical proposals for basing corporate ethics on my conception of Aristotelian justice as a point of equipoise.
en
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/1842/39764
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/3012
dc.language.iso
en
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
Aristotle
en
dc.subject
Virtue Ethics
en
dc.subject
Function
en
dc.subject
Character
en
dc.subject
Eudaimonia
en
dc.subject
Business ethics
en
dc.subject
Philosophy
en
dc.subject
Virtues
en
dc.subject
justice
en
dc.subject
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
en
dc.subject
Ethics
en
dc.title
Justice as a point of equipoise: an Aristotelian approach to contemporary corporate ethics
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
KellyO_2022.pdf
Size:
1.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)