Post-stroke depression (PSD) and post-stroke emotional liability (PSEL) : a systematic review of non-pharmacological interventions for PSD, and a qualitative study of specialist professionals' conceptualisation of PSEL
dc.contributor.advisor
Power, Michael
en
dc.contributor.advisor
O'Rourke, Suzanne
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Laidlaw, Kenneth
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Quayle, Ethel
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Gillespie, David
en
dc.contributor.author
Picton, Hannah Kathryn
en
dc.date.accessioned
2014-12-03T14:29:42Z
dc.date.available
2014-12-03T14:29:42Z
dc.date.issued
2014-07-01
dc.description.abstract
Aims: a review of the literature on non-pharmacological interventions for post-stroke depression (PSD) was completed with the aim of examining issues regarding the design and methodology of trials for non-pharmacological interventions for PSD. The empirical research study used a constructivist Grounded Theory approach to explore specialist stroke professionals' conceptualisations of post-stroke emotional lability (PSEL). The author also aimed to examine how staff experienced, understood and identified PSEL in clinical practice, and particularly how they differentiated it from PSD. Method: A systematic review of RCT and non-RCT studies was conducted to address the first aim. In relation to the second aim, a qualitative investigation of specialist professionals' conceptualisations of PSEL was conducted using Charmaz' (2006) version of constructivist Grounded Theory. Results: The systematic review highlighted the importance of appropriate sampling methods, multiple treatment design, rigorous data collection, the implementation and monitoring of interventions, assessment of participant suitability for the intervention, and issues related to long-term sustainability (follow-up) when designing and evaluating non-pharmacological interventions for PSD. The qualitative investigation yielded a conceptual model of how specialist professionals conceptualise and identify PSEL in their clinical practice. Conclusions and implications: The findings from the systematic review and the qualitative investigation highlighted a range of issues for specialist stroke services. The systematic review emphasised the importance of further evaluation and consideration of carefully planned randomised controlled trials for investigating non-pharmacological interventions for PSD. The qualitative study indicated a need for further guidance on the assessment and identification of PSEL, training for staff, and further examination of the caused of PSEL.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/9760
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
stroke
en
dc.subject
post-stroke depression
en
dc.subject
emotional lability
en
dc.subject
identification
en
dc.subject
randomised controlled trials
en
dc.title
Post-stroke depression (PSD) and post-stroke emotional liability (PSEL) : a systematic review of non-pharmacological interventions for PSD, and a qualitative study of specialist professionals' conceptualisation of PSEL
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
DClinPsychol Doctor of Clinical Psychology
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Picton2014.pdf
- Size:
- 6.69 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

