Bioactive scaffolds for potential bone regenerative medical applications
dc.contributor.advisor
Simpson, Hamish
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Noble, Brendon
en
dc.contributor.author
Sharp, Duncan McNeill Craig
en
dc.date.accessioned
2014-10-13T14:06:03Z
dc.date.available
2014-10-13T14:06:03Z
dc.date.issued
2011-07-05
dc.description.abstract
Fracture non-unions and bone defects represent a recalcitrant problem in the field of
orthopaedic surgery. Although the current gold-standard treatment, autologous bone
grafting, has a relatively high success rate, the technique is not without serious
problems. The emerging field of regenerative medicine may have the potential to
provide an alternative treatment. One promising strategy involves the delivery of
both cells and multiple growth factors with different release profiles.
A range of scaffolds was developed from Poly( -caprolactone) (PCL), Poly(lactideco-
glycolide) (PLGA), and two blends of PCL (Mn 42,500) and PLGA. The
scaffolds were manufactured utilising a novel modified fused deposition modelling
system, using polymer/dichloromethane solutions. The scaffolds were found to have
pore sizes suitable for bone regenerative medical applications (373±9.5 μm in the Ydirection
and 460±13 μm in the X-direction). However, the scaffolds were found to
be only 52±3 μm in height. This means that the two-layer scaffolds were relatively
flat. This was undesirable, as direct control of the complete 3D geometry was the
favoured strategy, though it may not be a necessary requirement.
Five scaffold coatings were also developed from alginate, chitosan (crosslinked using
sodium hydroxide or tripolyphosphate), Type-I collagen and Type-A gelatin. The
scaffold coatings were screened in vitro for their cell-compatibility with human
marrow stromal cells (hMSCs), human osteoblasts and MG63 cells.
This was
assessed using an assay for cell death, and assessing total cell counts.
From these
studies, Type-I collagen was found to be the optimum coating. For hMSCs, their
death rates were found to be 19.1±6.3% for alginate, 5.3±3.6% and 2.9±1.4% for
chitosan crosslinked with tripolyphosphate and sodium hydroxide respectively,
compared to 0.11±0.07% for Type-I collagen, and 0.15±0.13% and 0.16±0.12% for
0.1% and 0.2% gelatin respectively. Type-I collagen was found to be the most cellcompatible
coating, as it was consistently associated with higher cell counts than
Type-A gelatin.
Similarly, PCL scaffolds vacuum dried for 1 hr were found to be cell-compatible.
No detectable clinically significant difference was found in either total cell counts, or
the proportion of cell death in; hMSCs exposed to PCL scaffolds processed with
dichloromethane, hMSCs either exposed to scaffolds known to be biocompatible, or
hMSCs cultured in the absence of scaffolds. When cell morphology was compared,
scaffolds vacuum dried for 1 hr or more were found to have a similar morphology to
the cells cultured in the absence of scaffolds. It was therefore concluded that a
vacuum drying time of 1 hr was sufficient for cell-compatibility.
The scaffold materials were screened both for their encapsulation efficiencies and
release characteristics using the model drug, methylene blue. The encapsulation
efficiency was found to be both relatively high and consistent for both Mn 42,500 and
80,000 PCL as well as PCL:PLGA 66:33, at 71±6%, 71±5%, and 78±10%
respectively, relative to the low efficiencies recorded for both PCL:PLGA 66:33 and
PLGA: 57±5% and 38±10% respectively.
The release rate of methylene blue from PCL (Mn 42,500), was found to be relatively
slow, controlled, and consistent between batches (between 21±2% and 20±3%
released in the first 24 hr). Despite the release rate being consistent for PCL (Mn
80,000), the release rate was thought to be too high, since between 29±3% and
39±5% of the test compound was released in the first 24 hr period. The release rate
of methylene blue from the PCL/PLGA blends (between 17±2% – 30±7% and
18±4% – 31±6% in the first 24 hr) and PLGA (between 7.1±3.4% – 9.3±2.9% in the
first 24 hr) were found to be inconsistent, and low in the case of PLGA, even taking
the different loading efficiencies into account. Therefore, PCL (Mn 42,500) was
selected as the favoured candidate scaffold material.
The loading content and release profiles from methylene blue loaded collagen
scaffold coatings were also evaluated. The drug loading capacity was found to be
suitable for use as a drug delivery system (65±5 μg/g of methylene blue per unit
scaffold mass). The release of methylene blue was observed to be rapid (between
54±10% – 70±17% in the first 24 hr), which was thought to be desirable for the
coating delivery system.
Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7 (rhBMP-7) was used as a
representative growth factor of interest for bone regenerative medical applications. It
was loaded in collagen scaffold coatings (CoatBMP 1.25) and encapsulated within PCL
(Mn 42,500) scaffolds (ScaffBMP 1.25). Control coatings and scaffolds were designated
CoatPBS and ScaffPBS respectively. Both delivery systems were found to release
detectable quantities of rhBMP-7 (releasing 2.8±0.2 μg/g and 87±7 ng/g respectively
in the first 24 hr), even after 14 days. The release rate of the growth factor from the
scaffold coating was higher than that from the encapsulating scaffolds.
However, the
cumulative release profiles were found to deviate from the desired ideal release
profiles, and burst release was observed from both delivery systems.
Although
differences were observed for the two delivery systems, this difference may not be of
clinical significance.
Nevertheless, scaffolds with less than ideal delivery properties may still be of
potential clinical use. The bioactivity of the rhBMP-7 released from the test
scaffolds was therefore assessed by quantifying the area of normalised ALP staining
of hMSCs. The release of rhBMP-7 from the collagen coating of the PCL (Mn
42,500) scaffolds (CoatBMP 1.25ScaffPBS) was capable of statistically significantly
increasing hMSC normalised ALP expression, although the actual differences were
often relatively small. Therefore, at least a proportion of the growth factor released
is likely to have been bioactive. The release from scaffolds encapsulating rhBMP-7
(CoatPBSScaffBMP 1.25) did not have this effect on the hMSCs, indicating that either the
concentration released was too low, or the growth factor released was no longer
bioactive.
However, when the cells were seeded directly onto the scaffolds, the activity of ALP,
normalised by a DNA assay, was statistically significantly increased for the
CoatPBSScaffBMP 1.25 scaffolds, in hMSCs from all three test patient donors (by
35±10% on the control). ALP activity was also significantly increased in hMSCs
from two of the three patients seeded onto CoatBMP 1.25ScaffBMP 1.25 scaffolds (by
39±10% on the control). ALP activity was only statistically significantly increased
for one of the hMSC patients when seeded onto CoatBMP 1.25ScaffPBS scaffolds (by
35±14% on the control).
The functional osteoinductive capacity of Type-I collagen coated PCL (Mn 42,500)
scaffolds loaded with rhBMP-7 was assessed using C2C12 cells seeded onto the
scaffolds, and quantified using qRT-PCR. The genes of interest were; Type-I
collagen (Col1), osteopontin (OP), ALP, osteocalcin (OC) and runt related
transcription factor 2 (Runx2). The CoatBMP 1.25ScaffPBS scaffolds had an early
osteoinductive effect on the C2C12 cells, as ALP, OC and Runx2 were elevated
during the first 2 days only, compared to the control (e.g. by 44±12%, 128±42%,
60±25% and 46±25% respectively at the 24 hr mark).
The CoatPBSScaffBMP 1.25 scaffolds also had an osteoinductive effect on the cells,
which was more sustained than that observed for the CoatBMP 1.25ScaffPBS group.
While OP, ALP and Runx2 were up-regulated in the first 24 hr compared to the
control (by 38±10%, 208±82% and 72±31% respectively), statistically significant
up-regulation of the late marker OC was delayed until the 48 hr mark (by 73±49%).
The effect was found to be sustained until day 7, when OC and Runx2 were both
statistically significantly up-regulated compared to the control (by 151±91% and
93±27% respectively).
The CoatBMP 1.25ScaffBMP 1.25 scaffolds were found to combine the early effect of the
CoatBMP 1.25ScaffPBS scaffolds, with the more sustained effect of the CoatPBSScaffBMP
1.25 scaffolds. ALP, OC and Runx2 were all up-regulated at the 24 hr mark (by
312±56%, 329±39% and 96±25% respectively). This osteoinductive effect was
sustained until day 7 when Col1, ALP and Runx2 were still up-regulated compared
to the control (by 174±78%, 72±24% and 178±78% respectively).
These data suggest that the scaffolds containing rhBMP-7 have a weak
osteoinductive effect on the cells seeded onto them. The different delivery systems
were found to affect the cells differently. The clinical significance of this was not
assessed in these studies.
1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) was used as a model drug to assess the
feasibility of releasing lipid-soluble active factors from the scaffolds.
This was
assessed by quantifying the area of normalised ALP staining of hMSCs.
The release
of 1,25(OH)2D3 from the loaded collagen scaffold coatings and the encapsulating
scaffolds significantly increased ALP expression compared to the control scaffold
groups (by 115±28% and 69±25% respectively). Furthermore, ALP expression was
significantly increased when the two delivery systems were used together, when
compared to either delivery system on its own.
These data suggest that the delivery of lipid-soluble active factors is feasible from
collagen coated PCL scaffolds, and that the coating and encapsulating delivery
systems are mutually compatible.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/9520
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
bone
en
dc.subject
tissue engineering
en
dc.title
Bioactive scaffolds for potential bone regenerative medical applications
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Sharp2011.pdf
- Size:
- 17.3 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

