Freedom of artistic expression under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights
dc.contributor.advisor
Mac Amhlaigh, Cormac
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Tierney, Stephen
en
dc.contributor.author
Lowe, James Joseph Greaves
en
dc.date.accessioned
2017-08-29T13:05:43Z
dc.date.available
2017-08-29T13:05:43Z
dc.date.issued
2017-07-06
dc.description.abstract
Under the auspices of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights the right
to freedom of expression is said to be held by everyone and to include the freedom to hold
opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public
authority, subject to the limitation clauses outlined in Article 10(2). Whilst the text of
Article 10 therefore makes no explicit reference to specifically artistic expression, the
European Court of Human Rights has, in its interpretation of ‘information and ideas’,
nevertheless accepted that artistic expression does indeed fall within the ambit of Article
10’s protection of freedom of expression.
However, despite the Court recognising artistic expression as a form of expression within
the framework of Article 10, conclusions reached in the early case law concerning the issue
of controversial artworks would appear to suggest the judicial creation of an implicit
hierarchy of expression under which artistic expression is seen to enjoy a relatively low
level of protection. Given the non-differentiated articulation of the right to freedom of
expression enounced in the text of Article 10, the creation of such a hierarchy of expression
is therefore a cause for doctrinal concern.
In seeking to assess this misnomer the thesis’ analysis of the treatment of artistic expression
under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights may be distilled in to two
component parts. Firstly, a theoretical basis will be established from which artistic
expression may be located within the context of the discourse pertaining to freedom of
expression more generally. Having confirmed that, whilst of a distinctive, sui generis
nature, artistic expression may indeed constitute ‘expression’ for the purposes of freedom
of expression doctrine the second part of the thesis will examine the particular question of
artistic expression’s treatment under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human
Rights.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/23442
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
Article 10
en
dc.subject
freedom of expression
en
dc.subject
freedom of artistic expression
en
dc.subject
European Convention on Human Rights
en
dc.title
Freedom of artistic expression under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

