Ollis, Stewart

2018-03-29T12:19:26Z

2018-03-29T12:19:26Z

2008

A multitude of performance domains pursue the goal of understanding how we develop talent and expertise. Therefore, the main objective of the present work was to embrace this pursuit whilst operating in a sporting context. The work initially adopted an exploratory, critical and investigative approach to the problem with the remaining series of studies emerging from these initial findings. Study 1 utilised ethnographic enquiry over an eighteen month period whilst working in collaboration with the Rugby Football Union Elite Referee Unit. The study found shifts in existing perspectives of expertise and talent development including a) the movement from a descriptive and phase-staged approach to one which is dynamic and non-linear, b) nonnormative as well as normative influences, c) recognition of an 'expert self as intrapersonal, interpersonal, group and social, d) expertise development existing at micro-, meso- and macrodevelopment levels, e) an integrative, contextualised and multiplicative nature of expertise, f) emergent as well as planned development, g) identification of a 'nested' and ecological outlook of expertise acknowledging the necessity of a positive 'talent development environment'. Additionally, mechanisms of expertise expanded on the existing theory of deliberate practice to include 'deliberate experience' and 'transfer of skills'. In sum- study 1 encountered an approach to expertise which embraced complexity and paradox, was equally psycho-social dynamic than intrapersonal and fostered the necessity for a creation of contexts from which elite performance can morph. From these findings, and alternative studies and readings, a period of reflection occurred where models of 'non-linear and dynamical systems', 'talent development environments', 'adaptive expertise', 'fractal models' and the promotion of adaptive expertise, self-regulation and meta-cognitive skills required to negotiate the complex pathway associated with eminent performance was explored before a final sense-making notion of 'expertise as constructivism' was embraced. The remainder of the work embraced this constructivist approach of expertise and talent development which was then researched in collaboration with the Scottish Small-Bore Shooting team over a two year period. The period of work embraced 'constructivism as action research'. Study 2 utilised an 'ecological task analysis' of the Scottish Small Bore Shooting team and its members to identify constraints and affordances of excellence. It also served as a benchmark of existing levels of expertise which were evaluated at the end of the action research. Study 3 served as the primary research study and assessed the overall efficacy of the constructivist developmental approach inclusive of major transition processes over the two year period as served by the constructivist design. The program was deemed successful in relation to performance outcomes at the 2006 Melbourne Commonwealth Games. Study 4 focused on the importance of creating constructivist 'talent development environments' in comparison to an existing work of literature. Findings suggest a constructivist talent development environment which attends to both the planned and emergent nature of expertise requires fostering. Finally, a theoretical model of constructivist expertise and talent development is offered encompassing the overall findings of the work.

http://hdl.handle.net/1842/29306

The University of Edinburgh

Annexe Thesis Digitisation Project 2018 Block 17

Already catalogued

Constructive expertise: a critical, ecological and micro-developmental perspective on developing talent

Thesis or Dissertation

Doctoral

PhD Doctor of Philosophy