Edinburgh Research Archive

Emotional intelligence and manipulation: Are those scoring higher on EI measures more likely to negatively manipulate others' for personal gains?

dc.contributor.advisor
Austin, Elizabeth
en
dc.contributor.author
Carter, Sophie
en
dc.date.accessioned
2014-03-28T14:16:32Z
dc.date.available
2014-03-28T14:16:32Z
dc.date.issued
2013
dc.description.abstract
The association between emotional intelligence (EI) and manipulation was examined in this study. The possibility that individuals who score higher on EI would be more likely to negatively manipulate others for personal gain was the main hypothesis. The links between EI/manipulation and perceived social support, gender, and personality were also examined. Another aim was to validate a new 58 item measurement regarding mood changing techniques by conducting a factor analysis, which extracted four factors called reassurance, emotional Mach, emotional concealment and negative manipulation. A second study was then conducted to see whether participants’ factor scores correlated significantly between two separate times. Two online surveys were created, the first composed of measurements regarding the changing mood survey (CMS), emotional management (STEM), emotional understanding (STEU), perceived social support (MSPSS) and a personality measure (Mini-IPIP). The second survey just included the CMS measure. Although the relationship between overall EI and manipulation was non-significant, males were found to be more likely to manipulate than females if their STEU score was high. EI correlated most positively with reassurance methods of positive mood changing. The personality factors most associated with EI were Openness, Conscientiousness and Neuroticism. It was also found that higher scores on reassurance scores were the biggest predictor of scores on overall perceived social support although positive relationships were also found with the three subscales. Our findings show that people scoring higher on EI measures are less likely to negatively manipulate others and report higher levels of perceived social support. Males were found to score higher on measures looking at negative aspects of manipulation and also found to be more likely to conceal emotions. Strengths and limitations of the study are examined and possibilities for future research are discussed.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/8704
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
Emotional intelligence
en
dc.subject
manipulation
en
dc.title
Emotional intelligence and manipulation: Are those scoring higher on EI measures more likely to negatively manipulate others' for personal gains?
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Undergraduate
en
dc.type.qualificationname
Undergraduate
en
dcterms.accessRights
Restricted Access
en

Files

This item appears in the following Collection(s)