Diplomatic immunities ratione materiae under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations: towards a coherent interpretation
dc.contributor.advisor
Behrens, Paul
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Neff, Stephen
en
dc.contributor.author
Shi, Xinxiang
en
dc.date.accessioned
2018-10-23T10:28:05Z
dc.date.available
2018-10-23T10:28:05Z
dc.date.issued
2018-11-28
dc.description.abstract
Rules of diplomatic immunity, which nowadays are enshrined in the Vienna Convention on
Diplomatic Relations, play an important role in interstate diplomacy because they ensure the
efficient performance of diplomatic functions.
This thesis investigates a particular form of diplomatic immunity — diplomatic immunity
ratione materiae. Unlike diplomatic immunity ratione personae, which pertains to the personal
status of a diplomatic agent, diplomatic immunity ratione materiae depends in essence on the
official nature of a particular act
In practice, however, the determination of diplomatic immunity ratione materiae may meet
with many conceptual and practical difficulties. For one, it is not always easy to distinguish
the official acts of a diplomatic agent, who represents the sending State in the receiving State,
from his or her private acts. In case of disagreement between the two States, questions may
also arise as to who has the authority to make a final determination. The Vienna Convention
does not offer much guidance on these issues; on the contrary, the Convention complicates
them by employing, without adequate explanation, distinct formulas for different kinds of
diplomatic immunity ratione materiae.
This thesis examines these formulas in detail. On a general level, it is submitted that diplomatic
immunity ratione materiae for certain types of activity constitutes not only a procedural bar to
court proceedings but also a substantive exemption of individual responsibility. More
specifically, it is argued that each formula must be understood in the light of the rationale
behind immunity, the type of immunity concerned, and the specific functions or duties
performed. In case of controversy, weight should be given to the opinion of the sending State,
although the authority to make a decision lies ultimately with the court of the receiving State.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/33152
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
diplomatic immunity
en
dc.subject
Vienna Convention
en
dc.subject
official acts
en
dc.subject
local jurisdiction
en
dc.title
Diplomatic immunities ratione materiae under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations: towards a coherent interpretation
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Shi2018.pdf
- Size:
- 2.64 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

