Edinburgh Research Archive

Clinical effectiveness of CBT-based guided self-help for anxiety and depression: does it work in practice and what helps people to benefit?

dc.contributor.advisor
Morris, Paul
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Millar, Neil
en
dc.contributor.author
Coull, Greig Joseph
en
dc.date.accessioned
2014-12-11T14:40:05Z
dc.date.available
2014-12-11T14:40:05Z
dc.date.issued
2011-11
dc.description.abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the clinical effectiveness of guided self-help (GSH) for anxiety and depression in routine clinical practice, and the role of self-efficacy, therapeutic alliance and socio-economic status in influencing that effectiveness. DESIGN: A within-subjects repeated measures design in which participants served as their own controls by completing questionnaires across a control period prior to GSH intervention, then again at post-intervention and 3- and 6-month follow-up. METHODS: GSH participants completed outcome measures for mental health (HADS) and work/social functioning (WSAS). Factors explored by regression as possible predictors of effectiveness were self-efficacy, therapeutic alliance and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Sixty people completed GSH, with analyses indicating effectiveness of GSH in significantly improving mental health and social functioning at post-treatment and 3-month follow-up, but not at 6-month follow-up. Effectiveness was also indicated under intent-to-treat conditions (n = 97) with medium effect sizes (≈ 0.6) for each outcome measure at post-treatment. Improvement in mental health was predicted by lower self-efficacy and greater therapeutic alliance. Completers of the intervention had significantly higher socio-economic status than non-completers. CONCLUSIONS: The current study has suggested effectiveness of GSH in routine clinical practice across different primary care services at post-treatment, but with less evidence of this at follow-up. Effectiveness has been highlighted to be influenced by self-efficacy and therapeutic alliance, suggesting the importance of considering non-specific factors when patients access GSH in primary care. This study underlines the need for further research exploring longer-term clinical effectiveness and examining for whom GSH works in order to constructively inform future evidence-based practice.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/9802
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
CBT
en
dc.subject
clinical practice
en
dc.subject
effectiveness
en
dc.subject
review
en
dc.subject
self-help
en
dc.title
Clinical effectiveness of CBT-based guided self-help for anxiety and depression: does it work in practice and what helps people to benefit?
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
DClinPsychol Doctor of Clinical Psychology
en

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Coull2011.pdf
Size:
2.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)