Clinical effectiveness of CBT-based guided self-help for anxiety and depression: does it work in practice and what helps people to benefit?
dc.contributor.advisor
Morris, Paul
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Millar, Neil
en
dc.contributor.author
Coull, Greig Joseph
en
dc.date.accessioned
2014-12-11T14:40:05Z
dc.date.available
2014-12-11T14:40:05Z
dc.date.issued
2011-11
dc.description.abstract
OBJECTIVES:
To examine the clinical effectiveness of guided self-help (GSH) for
anxiety and depression in routine clinical practice, and the role of self-efficacy,
therapeutic alliance and socio-economic status in influencing that effectiveness.
DESIGN:
A within-subjects repeated measures design in which participants served
as their own controls by completing questionnaires across a control period prior to GSH
intervention, then again at post-intervention and 3- and 6-month follow-up.
METHODS:
GSH participants completed outcome measures for mental health
(HADS) and work/social functioning (WSAS). Factors explored by regression as
possible predictors of effectiveness were self-efficacy, therapeutic alliance and socioeconomic
status.
RESULTS:
Sixty people completed GSH, with analyses indicating effectiveness of
GSH in significantly improving mental health and social functioning at post-treatment
and 3-month follow-up, but not at 6-month follow-up. Effectiveness was also indicated
under intent-to-treat conditions (n = 97) with medium effect sizes (≈ 0.6) for each
outcome measure at post-treatment. Improvement in mental health was predicted by
lower self-efficacy and greater therapeutic alliance. Completers of the intervention had
significantly higher socio-economic status than non-completers.
CONCLUSIONS:
The current study has suggested effectiveness of GSH in routine clinical
practice across different primary care services at post-treatment, but with less evidence
of this at follow-up. Effectiveness has been highlighted to be influenced by self-efficacy
and therapeutic alliance, suggesting the importance of considering non-specific factors
when patients access GSH in primary care. This study underlines the need for further
research exploring longer-term clinical effectiveness and examining for whom GSH
works in order to constructively inform future evidence-based practice.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/9802
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
CBT
en
dc.subject
clinical practice
en
dc.subject
effectiveness
en
dc.subject
review
en
dc.subject
self-help
en
dc.title
Clinical effectiveness of CBT-based guided self-help for anxiety and depression: does it work in practice and what helps people to benefit?
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
DClinPsychol Doctor of Clinical Psychology
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Coull2011.pdf
- Size:
- 2.3 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

