Implementation of Enterprise Risk Management practices
dc.contributor.advisor
Ansell, Jake
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Archibald, Tom
en
dc.contributor.author
Agarwal, Ruchi
en
dc.date.accessioned
2017-12-21T14:48:50Z
dc.date.available
2017-12-21T14:48:50Z
dc.date.issued
2017-11-27
dc.description.abstract
The existence of complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in current business environment
promotes corporates need to establish good risk governance. Enterprise Risk Management
(ERM) has been considered as a way to achieve good risk governance to deal with both
upside (e.g. exploit opportunities) and downside (e.g. reduce insolvency) of risk and
uncertainty. ERM holistically treats all risk to achieve organisation objective in normal,
volatile and crisis situations. The thesis tackles issues in the implementation of ERM and
how it has been adopted and implemented in Indian and UK insurance market. Mixed
research methods have been employed from a qualitative stand point to explore the
research issues, consisting of two surveys in UK and India, over 50 interviews and two
case studies in the Indian and UK insurance markets. The research revealed that there is
an ambiguity in the understanding of the definitions of ERM and risk appetite across both
countries. Major issues in ERM implementation in Indian insurance market are fraud,
under-risk reporting and insufficient resources to develop an appropriate risk culture. In
the UK insurance market issues are related to customer complaints, fines/penalties, over-risk
reporting and lack of capital efficiency. Regulatory risk seen as a major risk in both
market, though, in the Indian market lack of regulation is the issue whereas in the UK
insurance market lack of clarity in insurance regulation has been emphasised. From
intuitional theory and strategic change perspective, the research presents cross-country
comparative case studies highlighting four emerging ERM strategies based on the
different state of development and maturity of companies: ‘Rudimentary’, ‘Anticipatory’,
‘Resilient’ and ‘Transformatory’ strategies. The case studies highlight the issues within
the two insurance companies both internally and externally in a nascent and a mature
market. Before companies can adopt a transformatory strategy, both companies require a
fundamental understanding of strategic change that eventually can pave the way to good
risk governance. Adopting the cognitive lens of strategic change will not only enhance
company specific risk-based capabilities but it will improve industry risk-based
capabilities through development of professional competence.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/25823
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
risk
en
dc.subject
governance
en
dc.subject
management
en
dc.subject
insurance
en
dc.title
Implementation of Enterprise Risk Management practices
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

