Strategies for earlier diagnosis of endometrial cancer: targeting endometrial hyperplasia
Item Status
Embargo End Date
Date
Authors
Sanderson, Peter Andrew
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological malignancy in the developed
world, with approximately 9000 new cases reported annually within the UK (2013-2015).
Incidence rates of EC have been steadily climbing over the last decade, with a notably steep
increase described in the 40 to 49-year-old age group, most likely as a consequence of rising
rates of obesity. Endometrial hyperplasia (EH) is a uterine pathology which is characterised
by an increase in the endometrial gland-to-stroma ratio when compared to endometrium from
the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle. The clinical significance of EH lies in its
association with progression to endometrioid endometrial cancer and ‘atypical’ forms of EH
are widely considered to be premalignant lesions.
The overarching objective of the studies described in this thesis was to use cellular
and molecular approaches to improve our capacity for earlier diagnosis of EC, through
targeting and enhancing our understanding of EH. The following aims were addressed:
1. To develop a human EH tissue resource and utilise this to evaluate the current methods used
to classify EH and predict its progression to EC.
2. To characterise key molecular changes within EH lesions so that they can be used to extend
and enhance pathological classification of EH.
3. To explore in vitro models of the endometrium and investigate the role of PTEN and
ARID1A in endometrial epithelial cell proliferation.
The results obtained herein provide novel insight into the diagnostic reproducibility
of the two prominent EH pathological classification systems; i) the well-known and widely
used World Health Organisation 1994 (WHO94) classification and ii) the more recent
Endometrioid Intraepithelial Neoplasia (EIN)/WHO2014 iteration. Following an extensive
retrospective review of patient medical records, a human tissue resource was established from
samples held within The Lothian NRS Human Annotated Bioresource. Archival tissue sections
from n=125 individual patient samples, that were pathologically diagnosed and coded as EH
lesions based on the WHO94 criteria, were identified. A dual, blinded, expert gynaecological
pathologist review was subsequently carried out. Interobserver percentage agreement for each
of the expert pathologists and the original WHO94 based diagnosis was 56.0 % (n=70) and
48.8 % (n=61) respectively. Upon reclassification using the EIN/WHO2014 classification
system, EIN lesions were identified in 52/125 patients, with increased interobserver agreement
noted between the expert pathologists (67.2 %, n=84). The EIN/WHO2014 classification
system also appeared to improve upon the WHO94 system when predicting progression to EC.
Investigation of EH lesions for molecular changes pertinent to endometrial
carcinogenesis revealed significant differences in the immunohistochemical expression
pattern of the tumour suppressor PTEN, and the transcription factors PAX2 and HAND2
between EIN and benign EH lesions. These data may, pending further validation studies, lend
favourably to their use as a diagnostic pathological aid. Somewhat unexpectedly, the frequency
of defects in mismatch repair protein (dMMR) expression was considerably less than
hypothesised amongst EIN lesions. This was surprising given that dMMR are reported in
approximately 25-30 % of somatic ECs.
An accepted risk factor for the development of both EH and EC is exposure to
‘unopposed oestrogens’ i.e. oestrogen without progesterone opposition. A novel in vitro model
was created utilising EC cell lines to investigate the proliferative effects of silencing two
commonly mutated genes within both EHs and ECs, namely PTEN and ARID1A, and also the
overexpression of oestrogen receptor alpha (ERα). Cellular manipulation of gene expression
for ERα, PTEN and ARID1A was performed. Findings demonstrated a significant increase in
EC cell proliferation with knockdown of PTEN and to a lesser extent ARID1A, when
compared to EC cells transfected with a scrambled sequence. The addition of a functional ERɑ
to the knockdown models did not appear to increase cell proliferation in this context.
In conclusion, novel data described herein highlights the current difficulties in
achieving a reproducible diagnosis for EH. The use of immunohistochemistry identified
changes in protein expression, which together with automated tissue analysis and in vitro
studies, were used to complement and extend our understanding of premalignant changes in
the endometrium. These findings have implications for the clinical management of women
diagnosed with EH, as well as the development of a personalised approach to monitoring of
women at increased risk of progression to EC.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

