Rewriting the limits between history and fiction: Jorge Luis Borges in the work of Leonardo Sciascia
dc.contributor.advisor
Mackintosh, Fiona
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Messina, Davide
en
dc.contributor.author
Martinez Nistal, Clara
en
dc.date.accessioned
2018-03-27T12:38:38Z
dc.date.available
2018-03-27T12:38:38Z
dc.date.issued
2018-07-08
dc.description.abstract
This thesis examines the preoccupation with the relationship between history and fiction
present in the work of Leonardo Sciascia and Jorge Luis Borges. By means of different
narrative strategies, both authors underscore the narrative elements that underpin any
reconstruction of the past, and in this way they link the process of reconstruction of past
events to the process of rewriting of a literary work. They emphasise, however, that whereas
the literary work can be enriched by multiple rewritings, multiple reconstructions of the same
real past event risk threatening its truthfulness.
This thesis investigates the different ways in which Borges’s and Sciascia’s works intersect,
across three narrative forms: the detective story, the historical essay (inchiesta or ‘enquiry’
for Sciascia) and the historical fiction. The analysis of Sciascia’s texts starts from a focus on
the structural similarities with the work of Borges in the detective story, paying particular
attention to Il contesto (1971), Todo modo (1974), and Il cavaliere e la morte (1988). It then
moves on to Sciascia’s inclusion of fragments of Borges’s texts in two of his inchieste,
L’affaire Moro (1978) and Il teatro della memoria (1981). The last chapter of the thesis
proposes a metafictional reading of Sciascia’s historical novel Il Consiglio d’Egitto (1963), in
the light of the comparisons with Borges’s work undertaken in the previous chapters.
The two key aims of this thesis are to show (1) that studying the ways in which Sciascia
integrates Borges’s texts in his own writing allows a deeper understanding of Sciascia’s texts,
but also underscores traits in Borges’s which might have been downplayed by previous
criticism of his work, and (2) that reconsidering in the light of this understanding a number of
Sciascia’s other texts where Borges’s influence is not explicit allows us to identify a
preoccupation with regards to the relationship between history and fiction shared between
both authors.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/29011
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.references
Paolo Squillacioti’s Opere
en
dc.relation.references
Borges, Obras completas volumen I & II RBA
en
dc.subject
Leonardo Sciascia
en
dc.subject
Jorge Luis Borges
en
dc.subject
narrative forms
en
dc.subject
detective story
en
dc.subject
historical essay
en
dc.subject
historical fiction
en
dc.subject
comparative literature
en
dc.title
Rewriting the limits between history and fiction: Jorge Luis Borges in the work of Leonardo Sciascia
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Martinez Nistal2018.pdf
- Size:
- 1.76 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

