Precarious lives, practices and spaces: an investigation into homelessness and alternative uses of public space
dc.contributor.advisor
Coyne, Richard
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Speed, Chris
en
dc.contributor.author
Gesuelli, Fabrizio
en
dc.date.accessioned
2018-09-24T10:11:02Z
dc.date.available
2018-09-24T10:11:02Z
dc.date.issued
2018-11-27
dc.description.abstract
The aim of this doctoral thesis is to investigate the practices of rough sleeping
and inhabiting public space, with a focus on the modern city of Rome. By
inhabiting public spaces, people who are homeless expose their private sphere to
public view. Paradoxically, this public exposure of the private becomes a means
of exclusion according to Judith Butler and Athena Athanasiou (2013).
Scholars acknowledge public space as constructed by the actions that people
carry out in public (Lefebvre 1991; Tschumi 1996; Harvey 2012; Jon Goodbun et
al. 2014). People who are homeless certainly contribute to the construction of
public space (Petty 2016). However, as asserted by architectural scholar Gill
Doron, certain practices “reveal how the public space is restricted to a very small
spectrum of activities, and how many other activities are not permitted” (Doron
2000, p.254). These practices put into question what public these spaces are
designed and designated for, questioning why only some activities are regarded
as public and why some others take place only at night when spaces are
temporary urban voids. Rough sleeping in Rome takes place mostly at night,
exposing the city to its own fragilities and contradictions. Public space emerges
as precarious. It is defned by social and cultural boundaries, within which urban
practices alternate one with the other. These are irreconcilable poles within a
parallax gap (Žižek 2009).
The theoretical scaffolding of the thesis is structured alongside two other
transgressive case studies: Pussy Riot's occupation in Moscow and my interviews
with parkour practitioners. These cases have been investigated in comparison
with homelessness in order to highlight aspects concerning occupation of space
as a performative action under precarious circumstances (precarity). The literary
review is combined with auto-ethnographical studies I conducted with a
community of rough sleepers, comprising 20-40 members who inhabit a portico
area nearby St Peter's Square in Rome. I also ran focus groups, individual
interviews and project presentations to people who either are involved in
charitable bodies that deal with homelessness or are part of the general public,
such as passers-by in St Peter's Square. This study has revealed a series of aspects
concerning the negotiation of public space and the role of agency and mediation.
This study has stimulated questions concerning the role design can play in
discourses of social innovation and inclusion. The research conducted has also
outlined diffculties concerning the range of data and the possible response to the
many voices heard. How can design re-imagine the centre ground between
alternative practices in space? By highlighting the centre as precarious, is it
possible to fnd a way of re-thinking the centre?
On the basis of this study, the aim of the research has been to look at the state of
the gap between these alternative poles, investigating and exploring the concept
of precarity. This suggests the possibility of redefning concepts of mediation,
social inclusion and architectural activism, articulated further through a series of
speculative projects, concluding with the presentation of a “precarious” object I
designed together with the community of rough sleepers in St Peter's Square and
COTRAD onlus (a charitable body based in Rome).
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/33075
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Gesuelli, Fabrizio. “Forced To Live Dead In Public Space: An Experiment Of Democracy In Rome.” University of Cyprus and the Cyprus Institute, Cyprus: Architecture_MPS, 2016. http://architecturemps.com/wpcontent/ uploads/2016/04/GESUELLI-F_FORCED-TO-LIVE-DEAD-IN-PUBLICSPACE_ AN-EXPERIMENT-OF-DEMOCRACY-IN-ROME.pdf.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Gesuelli, Fabrizio. “Urban Hackers: Parkour as an Emancipatory Practice for Open Source Urban Outskirt.” Studio Architectural Magazine 1, no. 7–Illegal (December 2015): 88–95.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Gesuelli, Fabrizio, and Chiara Andreotti. “The Urban Backdoor: Replacing the Meaning of Mediator in Architectural Public Space.” Int|AR Journal: Intervention + Adaptive Reuse 5, no. Resilience + Adaptablity (2014).
en
dc.subject
rough sleeping
en
dc.subject
public space
en
dc.subject
transgressive case studies
en
dc.subject
Pussy Riot
en
dc.subject
parkour
en
dc.subject
homelessness
en
dc.subject
St Peter's Square
en
dc.subject
COTRAD onlus
en
dc.title
Precarious lives, practices and spaces: an investigation into homelessness and alternative uses of public space
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Gesuelli2018_Redacted.pdf
- Size:
- 25.71 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

