Principalities and powers: revising John Howard Yoder’s sociological theology
dc.contributor.advisor
Fergusson, David
en
dc.contributor.author
Pitts, James Drake
en
dc.date.accessioned
2014-12-10T16:25:42Z
dc.date.available
2014-12-10T16:25:42Z
dc.date.issued
2011
dc.description.abstract
Evaluations of John Howard Yoder’s legacy have proliferated since his death in
1997. Although there is much disagreement, a broad consensus is forming that his
theology was, on the one hand, focused on the social and political meaning of the
New Testament accounts of Jesus Christ and, on the other hand, sociologically
reductive, hermeneutically tendentious, and ecclesiologically ambiguous. This thesis
proposes a revision of Yoder’s theology that maintains its broadly sociological
emphasis but corrects for its apparent problems. In specific, adjustments are made to
his social theory to open it to spiritual reality, to hone its analytical approach, and to
clarify its political import. To do so his preferred framework for social criticism, the
theology of the principalities and powers, is examined in the context of his wider
work and its critics, and then synthesized with concepts from Pierre Bourdieu’s
influential reflexive sociology.
Yoder maintains that the powers, understood as social structures, are part of God’s
good creation, fallen, and now being redeemed through their subjection to the risen
Lord Christ. Bourdieu’s fundamental sociological concepts--habitus, capital, and
field--enable an interpretation of the powers as dynamically constituted by their
relations to the triune God and to personal dispositions. His treatment of social
reproduction and freedom furthermore facilitate a construal of choice as a divinely
gifted, sociologically mediated freedom for obedience to God. The sinful restriction
of this freedom is read in light of Bourdieu’s concept of symbolic violence, which
recognizes the ambiguity of violence without thereby identifying any form of killing
as nonviolent. Violence and other phenomena can be investigated by a reflexive,
dialogical, and empirically rigorous comparison with the life of Christ. The church’s
spiritual participation in the redemption of the violent powers is conceptualized in
Bourdieusian terms as a critical legitimation of other political and cultural fields
made possible through autonomy from those fields. Christian social distinctiveness
moreover has universal meaning because it is oriented towards the worship of God
and so radically welcoming of others; and this sociological universality is distinctive
because it is the result of a particular history of social struggles with and for God.
These revisions to Yoder’s theology of the principalities and powers produce a
sociological theology that is material and spiritual, critical and dialogical,
and particular and universal. By incorporating these revisions, Yoder’s work can
continue to support those who seek peace in a world riven by violence.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/9798
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
theology
en
dc.subject
sociology
en
dc.subject
Yoder, John Howard
en
dc.subject
Bourdieu, Pierre
en
dc.title
Principalities and powers: revising John Howard Yoder’s sociological theology
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

