Theology of Andrew Fuller and its relation to Calvinism
Item Status
Embargo End Date
Date
Authors
Abstract
PART I. HISTORICAL: Andrew Puller, (1754-1815), a farmer's son, grew up in a hyper-Calvinist environment. After spiritual struggle he was converted, "baptized, and joined the Soham Baptist Church. Theological controversy on sinful man's ability caused division in the Church, and the Minister left. Puller, encouraged to preach, became the Minister in 1775. He began to regard the hyper-Calvinist position as unbiblical, and examined its whole basis, probably reading Calvin. Robert Hall, Senior, introduced Puller to the writings of Jonathan Edwards, but his influence was less than is usually assumed.
Puller moved to be Minister at Kettering in 1783. He found congenial friends in Ryland, Sutcliff, and Carey. Through united labours, theological, devotional, and practical, the Baptist Missionary Society was founded in 1792, with Puller the first Secretary. Advocating the cause he travelled much, including five visits to Scotland, where he met Thomas Chalmers. Theological controversy with Socinians, Deists, and Universalists, followed various writings of Puller. Worn out by his labours he died at Kettering.
PART II. THEOLOGICAL: On settling at Kettering, Puller offered a Confession of Faith. It makes a useful beginning for a comparison of Puller's theology with that of Calvin. Its themes, developed in Puller's writings, are similar to much in Calvin.
1. The existence of God is known to all through His works; the nature of God as Triune is given in the Bible.
2. Revelation is a free Divine activity, only truly known in Christ.
3. The dual character of the Bible as inspired by God yet written by man is recognised.
4. Man, made in the Divine image, has lost his rectitude by the Pall. Physical and psychological capacities work amiss.
Though man is impotent through sin, he is nevertheless accountable, and must be called to repent. God's Spirit uses the preached invitations to bring men to faith, which is the total response of mind, heart and will.
5. Election, which is from eternity to eternity, is independent of foreknowledge; reprobation is the unhappy reverse. Puller softens the latter by emphasis on the manifest cause in man's sin, over against the hidden cause in God's counsel in Election.
6. Signs of the Covenant Theology appear in the form of Puller's thought on the everlasting covenant of grace, gradually made known, whose content, though not its form of administration, is always the same.
7. Perseverance is the gift of God, not a supreme effort of man.
8. Calvin and Puller disagree completely on the mode and subject of Baptism, but have some curious similarities on the nature of the sacrament. Puller insists that Holy Communion is only for immersed believers.
9. Eschatological expectations are similar in Calvin and Puller, though Fuller has some temporal hopes associated with his view of the Apocalypse.
10. At the Last Judgement, which the Second Advent introduces, the cause of God is fully and finally vindicated.
Two conclusions: 1. Puller read widely in Calvin. 2. Puller's claim to be a Calvinist after the pattern of John Calvin is entirely substantiated.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

