Simulating the carbon cycling of croplands - model development, diagnosis, and regional application through data assimilation
Files
Item Status
Embargo End Date
Date
Authors
Sus, Oliver
Abstract
In the year 2000, croplands covered about 12% of the Earth’s ice-free land surface.
Through cropland management, humankind momentarily appropriates about 25% of
terrestrial ecosystem productivity. Not only are croplands a key element of human food
supply, but also bear potential in increased carbon (C) uptake when best-practice land
management approaches are adopted. A detailed assessment of the impact of land use
on terrestrial ecosystems can be achieved by modelling, but the simulation of crop C
cycling itself is a relatively new discipline. Observational data on crop net ecosystem
exchange (NEE) are available only recently, and constitute an important tool for model
development, diagnosis, and validation. Before crop functional types (CFT) had been
introduced, however, large-scale biogeochemical models (BGCM) lacked crop-specific
patterns of phenology, C allocation, and land management. As a consequence, the
influence of cropland C cycling on biosphere-atmosphere C exchange seasonality and
magnitude is currently poorly known. To date, no regional assessment of crop C cycling
and yield formation exists that specifically accounts for spatially and temporally varying
patterns of sowing dates within models.
In this thesis, I present such an assessment for the first time. In the first step (chapter 2),
I built a crop C mass balance model (SPAc) that models crop development and C
allocation as a response to ambient meteorological conditions. I compared model
outputs against C flux and stock observations of six different sites in Europe, and
found a high degree of agreement between simulated and measured fluxes (R2 = 0.83).
However, the model tended to overestimate leaf area index (LAI), and underestimate final yield. In a model comparison study (chapter 3), I found in cooperation with
further researchers that SPAc best reproduces observed fluxes of C and water (owed
to the model’s high temporal and process resolution), but is deficient due to a lack in
simulating full crop rotations.
I then conducted a detailed diagnosis of SPAc through the assimilation of C fluxes
and biometry with the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF, chapter 4), and identified
potential model weaknesses in C allocation fractions and plant hydraulics. Further, an
overestimation of plant respiration and seasonal leaf thickness variability were evident.
Temporal parameter variability as a response to C flux data assimilation (DA) is
indicative of ecosystem processes that are resolved in NEE data but are not captured by
a model’s structure. Through DA, I gained important insights into model shortcomings
in a quantitative way, and highlighted further needs for model improvement and future
field studies.
Finally, I developed a framework allowing for spatio-temporally resolved simulation
of cropland C fluxes under observational constraints on land management and canopy
greenness (chapter 5). MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) data
were assimilated both variationally (for sowing date estimation) and sequentially (for
improved model state estimation, using the EnKF) into SPAc. In doing so, I was
able to accurately quantify the multiannual (2000-2006) regional C flux and biometry
seasonality of maize-soybean crop rotations surrounding the Bondville Ameriflux eddy
covariance (EC) site, averaged over 104 pixel locations within the wider area. Results
show that MODIS-derived sowing dates and the assimilation of LAI data allow for
highly accurate simulations of growing season C cycling at locations for which groundtruth
sowing dates are not available. Through quantification of the spatial variability
in biometry, NEE, and net biome productivity (NBP), I found that regional patterns of
land management are important drivers of agricultural C cycling and major sources of
uncertainty if not appropriately accounted for. Observing C cycling at one single field
with its individual sowing pattern is not sufficient to constrain large-scale agroecosystem
behaviour. Here, I developed a framework that enables modellers to accurately simulate
current (i.e. last 10 years) C cycling of major agricultural regions and their contribution to atmospheric CO2 variability. Follow-up studies can provide crucial insights into
testing and validating large-scale applications of biogeochemical models.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

