Freedom in and out of work: platforms, precarity, and the democratization of work
dc.contributor.advisor
Mihai, Mihaela
dc.contributor.advisor
Hearn, Jonathan
dc.contributor.author
Keulen, Thijs
dc.date.accessioned
2023-11-06T15:54:06Z
dc.date.available
2023-11-06T15:54:06Z
dc.date.issued
2023-11-06
dc.description.abstract
This project explores and defends a seemingly simple proposition: if democracy is to be radical, the democratization of work should be a priority. Two contrasting observations motivate this exploration. The first is that a logic of work has extended into more and more areas of life while the place of formal employment has become increasingly precarious. Low pay, long hours and insecure working arrangements are now hallmarks of otherwise wealthy societies. The second is that despite this development, and despite resurging interest in some quarters of democratic theory, work is relatively neglected as a concern within much contemporary democratic theory. As such, this project explores 1) the conceptual resources contemporary democratic theory offers for a normative understanding of relationships of power connected to contemporary forms of work, and 2) its potential for envisioning a more emancipated organization of work. The methodological approach is one of ‘grounded normative theory’, with a commitment to tie in political theorizing with existing social critiques. As such, throughout the thesis I draw on original qualitative research carried out in the form of in-depth interviews with members of the grassroots union the Independent Workers of Great Britain (IWGB) who work as on-demand couriers in the platform economy.
This thesis advances three specific contributions. The first is a methodological critique that ties in with the approach just outlined. Namely, that the most common approaches to democratic theorizing (agonist and deliberative) suffer from a ‘socially weightless’ style of thought that, in different ways, has informed a neglect to think about work and the economy as important sites to be democratized. Secondly, and more positively, this thesis contributes to contemporary democratic theory by bringing the latter’s insights on freedom, equality, and agency in conversation with issues such as trade union organizing and resistance, conceptions of workplace democracy, post-work proposals for freedom from work, and models of a democratic economy. Lastly, a central argument that the thesis advances is that to democratize work implies democratizing the economy. For work to be democratic, it needs to be decommodified, serve deliberatively constituted social interests, while retaining worker autonomy at the level of the workplace.
en
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/1842/41110
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/3849
dc.language.iso
en
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
democracy
en
dc.subject
work
en
dc.subject
precarity
en
dc.subject
critical theory
en
dc.subject
platform labour
en
dc.title
Freedom in and out of work: platforms, precarity, and the democratization of work
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Keulen2023.pdf
- Size:
- 1.41 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

