Causal induction in time
dc.contributor.advisor
Bramley, Neil
dc.contributor.advisor
Horne, Zachary
dc.contributor.author
Gong, Tianwei
dc.date.accessioned
2023-11-10T14:08:07Z
dc.date.available
2023-11-10T14:08:07Z
dc.date.issued
2023-11-24
dc.description.abstract
Causes require time to propagate their effects. We can see stars at night because of the light they emitted hundreds of years ago. We can smell the fragrant aroma of baking bread because heat gradually changed the structure of the food, emitting particles that traveled on the breeze. In this thesis, I investigate how people use temporal information to make causal inferences. I propose a rational framework for causal induction based on continuous-time evidence, examine human performance in passive and active continuous-time causal learning tasks, and develop bounded rational accounts that can offer explanations for human causal judgments and intervention strategies.
Chapters 2 and 3 review previous theoretical frameworks on causal induction, and empirical work on the role of time in causal induction, respectively. Chapter 4 develops a rational framework for processing temporal evidence. It provides an explanation for how delays shape human causal induction and accounts for human causal judgments across seven different temporal causal learning tasks. Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 test how people passively or actively learn causal structures based on events unfolding in real time. I found people are capable temporal causal learners who successfully identify structures that involve generative and preventative relationships, as well as acyclic and cyclic connections. Nevertheless, the computational demands of normative learning could easily exceed human capacity. People’s causal judgments align better with an algorithm that approximates the normative solution via a simulation and local summary statistics scheme, suggesting the reliance on structurally local computation and temporally local evidence. People’s intervention decisions align better with a resource-rational model that emphasizes a balance between expected information and expected inferential complexity when choosing interventions. Chapter 7 shows that when given a limited period of observation, people not only focus on existing data, but also consider future possibilities, relying on extrapolated data to make inferences. This demonstrates the unique “continuing” feature of time, and how generalization plays a role in the utilization of temporal information. Chapter 8 synthesizes the findings of this thesis and proposes future research directions of causal learning in temporal contexts.
en
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/1842/41141
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/3877
dc.language.iso
en
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Gong, T., & Bramley, N. R. (2023). Continuous time causal structure induction with prevention and generation. Cognition, 240, 105530. (Materials, data, and analysis code available at https://osf.io/q8n72/)
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Gong, T., & Bramley, N. R. (2020). What you didn’t see: Prevention and generation in continuous time causal induction. In S. Denison, M. Mack, Y. Xu, & B. Armstrong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2908–2914)
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Gong, T., & Bramley, N. R. (2021). Learning preventative and generative causal structures from point events in continuous time.Proceedings of the Causal Inference & Machine Learning workshop at 35th Neural Information Processing Systems conference.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Gong, T., Gerstenberg, T., Mayrhofer, R., & Bramley, N. R. (2023). Active causal structure learning in continuous time. Cognitive Psychology, 140 (4), 101542. (Materials, data, and analysis code available at https://github.com/tianweigong/time_and_intervention)
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Gong, T., & Bramley, N. R. (2023). Evidence from the future. PsyArXiv. Accepted at Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. (Materials, data, and analysis code available at https://osf.io/h2y3g/)
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Gong, T., & Bramley, N. R. (2022). Intuitions and perceptual constraints on causal learning from dynamics. In J. Culbertson, A. Perfors, H. Rabagliati, & V. Ramenzoni (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1455–1461)
en
dc.subject
time information
en
dc.subject
causal relationships
en
dc.subject
human cognition
en
dc.subject
human-like algorithms
en
dc.subject
philosophy of science
en
dc.subject
continuous-time causal learning tasks
en
dc.subject
causal induction
en
dc.subject
processing temporal evidence
en
dc.title
Causal induction in time
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Gong2023.pdf
- Size:
- 6.33 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

