Devolution, democracy, and the challenge of diversity: community energy governance in Scotland
Item Status
Embargo End Date
Date
Authors
van Veelen, Bregje
Abstract
This research investigates the emergence of new participatory spaces in the
transition towards a low-carbon society. Specifically, it focuses on the emerging
spaces and roles for community groups in renewable energy governance.
The role
of community groups in facilitating a low-carbon transition has received much
attention in recent years, but has been insufficiently studied within the wider
context of evolving state-civil society relations. This research puts forward an
understanding of community energy initiatives that is neither inherently
celebratory nor dismissive of community action, but argues that such initiatives
should be understood based on the interactions – between practices, organisations
and relations – within and external to these communities. In doing so, this research
adopts an interdisciplinary approach, building on insights from both geography
and political science to understand how opportunities for community participation
are articulated in particular geographical and political contexts. Grounding this
research in Scotland shows the unique ways in which devolution – from the UK
Government to the Scottish Government, but primarily through the emerging
powers for community groups in Scotland – has created a set of spatially and
temporally-specific spaces and practices of intervention.
The devolution of energy governance, and the diversity of practices emerging
through this process, also raises questions, however, about the democratic qualities
of these new spaces and practices. This research specifically explores this issue
through building on the emerging concept of energy democracy. ‘Energy
democracy’ is a concept that has been adopted by a growing number of
international civil society actors who regard the transition to law-carbon energy
sources as an opportunity not only for technological innovation but also for wider
socio-economic transformation. Invoking an image of associative democracy, those
advocating for greater energy democracy consider self-governing community
groups as best placed to ensure that the transition towards a low-carbon society is
one that is more inclusive, democratic and just. While energy democracy, like
related concepts of energy citizenship and energy justice, aims to combine
technological and social transformation, its activist roots also means it is noticeably
different. This is evident in two ways. First, the current body of literature is largely
uncritical and rather vague in nature. The second consequence of the activist roots
of energy democracy is that it is diverse in its framing of the issue and its
formulation of desired transition pathways.
As its main contribution to existing academic debate, my thesis explores and
expands the conceptual foundations of ‘energy democracy’ by evaluating its
connections to different political theories, and the consequences of different
interpretations for energy democracy research and practice. Secondly, I seek to
develop the empirical evidence base for energy democracy. The current, primarily
activist, literature on energy democracy often assumes rather than demonstrates
that the forms of governance it promotes are more democratic than the status quo.
This PhD therefore sets out to analyse the complex and varied ways in which local
communities practice energy governance in Scotland. First, I introduce a
quantitatively-developed typology of community energy projects in Scotland to
highlight the diverse nature of the sector. Subsequently I demonstrate through
qualitative interviews with community groups how the diversity of the sector (both
within and between groups) both contributes to, and challenges, the democratic
claims made for and by community energy. In the final part I show that the
hybridity of spaces created by, and for, community energy intermediaries reflect
the interactions between policy and community-action. Through a focus on the
interaction between actors at different governance levels, my research helps to
improve an understanding of the creation and contestation of new spaces of
intervention in the Scottish energy transition as a process that not only reflects a
broader (re)structuring of state-civil society relations, but also provides an early
and somewhat experimental expression of such restructuring.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

