Currie, Morgan

Spring, Alli

2025-07-01T14:42:36Z

2025-07-01T14:42:36Z

2025-07-02

For the past several years, the UK’s Department of Work and Pensions’ (DWP) has quietly adopted automated data analytics and machine learning to detect fraud and error in social security applications. The department has disclosed very little about these initiatives to the public beyond cursory mentions in year-end accounting reports and answers to parliamentary questions, despite growing interest from politicians, grassroots groups and citizens in how they affect welfare applicants. One way to gain a larger picture of the DWP’s practices is to look at the results of Freedom of Information (FOI) Requests people have submitted over the years to ask about DWP’s data-intensive systems for fraud and error detection. This study analyses 51 such requests from 2018 up to the present; these present a chronology of some of the tools in place, the internal processes around them, how they are evaluated and how they relate to staff roles. The exercise yielded a collection of 44 internal documents that DWP released to requesters. We also gain insight into how charities and journalists deploy FOIA as a democratic tool – how they react to the publication of government reports, use FOIA procedures to obtain more details, and release these findings to the public in articles and reports in some cases, which can spur more requests by others. Finally, the FOI request dataset reveals inconsistencies across the DWP’s responses to requests: those who accept the DWP’s default refusals do not see the same information as those willing to pursue the matter through complaints to the Information Commissioner's Office.

https://hdl.handle.net/1842/43635

http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/6168

en

algorithmic accountability, automated decision-making, social security, department of work and pensions, transparency, democratic oversight

Algorithmic Accountability in the UK - How FOIA Sheds Light on Automated Welfare

Other