Judicial review of safeguard measures in the European Community
dc.contributor.author
Creally, Eugene Patrick
en
dc.date.accessioned
2019-02-15T14:38:20Z
dc.date.available
2019-02-15T14:38:20Z
dc.date.issued
1991
dc.description.abstract
en
dc.description.abstract
This thesis is an attempt to analyse the jurisprudence of the
European Court of Justice in the review of safeguard measures in the
European Community. The safeguard measures considered are the
Community's anti-dumping and anti-subsidy rules under Regulation
2423/88, safeguard measures under Regulation 288/82 and rules to
combat illicit commercial practices under Regulation 2641/84. These
instruments are part of the European Community's arsenal designed to
counteract unfair trade practices of Third Countries. Emphasis is
placed on the anti-dumping rules given that the measures imposing
anti-dumping duties are most frequently challenged before the Court.
en
dc.description.abstract
The thesis begins with a synopsis of the Community's competence to
deal exclusively with these matters. The respective roles of the
Community authorities and the Member States in the adoption of
protective measures is also considered.
en
dc.description.abstract
In order to understand the rationale of the Court's rulings in cases
involving safeguard measures each of the instruments are viewed from
an international and European perspective. The latter involves an
analysis of the Community's legislation with respect to the
substantive and procedural rules governing the imposition of
protective measures to combat unfair trade practices of Third
Countries.
en
dc.description.abstract
Having placed the safeguard measures in their proper perspective,
judicial review by the Court is viewed first from the standpoint of
an applicant's locus standi or standing to challenge a Community act
imposing protective measures. If an applicant has locus standi he
may apply to the Court for an award of interim measures pending the
outcome of the main application. The rules relating to such awards
are considered and the Court's rulings in cases involving safeguard
measures are analysed. Judicial review 'proper' in the sense of the
Court's review of the merits of the cases that have come before it to
date are considered in the light of the grounds of review in Article
173 of the EEC Treaty. This final chapter attempts to determine the
extent to which the Court is prepared to review the findings of the
authorities upon which the measures were adopted.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/35429
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.ispartof
Annexe Thesis Digitisation Project 2019 Block 22
en
dc.relation.isreferencedby
Already catalogued
en
dc.title
Judicial review of safeguard measures in the European Community
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- CreallyEP_1991redux.pdf
- Size:
- 66.16 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

