Constitutio Antoniniana: an edict for the Caracallan Empire
dc.contributor.advisor
Bingham, Sandra
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Grig, Lucy
en
dc.contributor.author
Imrie, Alex
en
dc.contributor.sponsor
other
en
dc.date.accessioned
2018-12-18T15:11:27Z
dc.date.available
2018-12-18T15:11:27Z
dc.date.issued
2015-11-26
dc.description.abstract
The constitutio Antoniniana represents one of the most important legal
documents of the Roman imperial period. By means of this edict, the emperor
Caracalla enfranchised nearly every free person living within the borders of his empire.
Despite its apparent significance, though, the constitutio remains a controversial
document among modern scholars. Some consider it to be the logical conclusion to an
evolutionary process in Roman citizenship that took over two centuries to achieve.
Others, however, believe that it is a meaningless document given retrospective
importance, changing little in the daily lives of the empire’s population and
representing nothing more than a superficial initiative brought forth by an absolute
monarch.
The primary focus of this thesis concerns the various reasons that Caracalla
might have had for passing the constitutio Antoniniana in the opening half of AD 212.
By considering elements such as the emperor’s fascination with Alexander the Great
and religious perspective, as well as issues surrounding the Roman imperial economy
and army, I will construct an image of the constitutio that is more multi-faceted than
has been presented in the past. The common thread running through these chapters,
however, is that Caracalla employed his edict as a tool in a programme of refashioning
the Severan dynasty – a programme that he found himself compelled to undertake in
the aftermath of the murder of his brother and co-emperor, Geta. I will also argue that
modern scholars have been wrong to dismiss the testimony offered by Cassius Dio, in
which the senator claimed that a fiscal rationale underlay the legislation. Whilst the
detail of Dio’s argument is undoubtedly questionable, this thesis will demonstrate that,
on a basic level, the senator was correct to identify a fiscal initiative contained within
the terms of the constitutio text.
The final chapter of the thesis will form a case study of Caracalla’s imperial
visit to Alexandria in AD 215/6. This is a challenging episode to analyse, since the
hostile literary tradition appears content to label the violence which marked the
emperor’s stay in the city as the result of a merciless massacre ordered by Caracalla in
revenge for an assortment of minor slights and insults. This chapter will re-assess the
events of the imperial visit and argue that the disturbances were not the result of the
emperor’s uncontrollable temper, but rather that they resulted from riots among the
local population that the local authorities were unable to control. Following this
hypothesis, I will examine to what extent the effects and implications of the constitutio
Antoniniana had a bearing on the disturbances in Alexandria. I contend that, although
it is obviously impossible to draw a direct link between the edict and the unrest, it is
possible to see that the social and fiscal implications of the legislation would have
exacerbated pre-existing local sensitivities and pressures to breaking point.
This work will represent one of the largest studies of Caracalla’s constitutio
undertaken in the English language to date. The aim of my study is not to function as
an apology for the emperor, but it is an attempt to view the constitutio Antoniniana in
a more rational way. My thesis thus acknowledges that the context in which the
legislation was passed is of critical importance not only to our understanding of the
constitutio as a document, but also to our assessment of Caracalla’s actions following
the murder of his younger brother.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/33299
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Bingham, S. and Imrie, A. (2015), ‘The Prefect and the Plot: a reassessment of the murder of Plautianus’, JAH 3: 76-91.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Imrie, A. (2014), ‘A Case of Mistaken Identity: Julia Domna as Concordia in RIC 380 and 381’, RBN 160: 307-15.
en
dc.subject
constitutio Antoniniana
en
dc.subject
Caracalla
en
dc.subject
Severan
en
dc.subject
citizenship
en
dc.subject
Roman Empire
en
dc.subject
ancient history
en
dc.title
Constitutio Antoniniana: an edict for the Caracallan Empire
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Imrie2015.pdf
- Size:
- 2.07 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

