Understanding and encouraging cycle commuting in workplace setting: a psychological perspective
dc.contributor.advisor
Williams, Joanne
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Morris, Paul
en
dc.contributor.author
Van Bekkum, Jennifer Elizabeth
en
dc.date.accessioned
2011-10-03T15:25:50Z
dc.date.available
2011-10-03T15:25:50Z
dc.date.issued
2011-07-04
dc.description.abstract
This thesis considers the roles that social cognitions play in cycle commuting behaviour.
Currently in the field of active travel there is a strong drive towards ecological theories,
which often focus on the wider environmental factors that influence cycling. However,
research into utilitarian cycling and related physical activities suggests that
psychological factors also have an important role to play. In light of the current political
climate within the UK and the numerous benefits that cycling for transport can incur, it
was deemed important to further explore the role that social cognitions play in the
decision to cycle commute.
To date, there has been limited psychological research carried out into cycle commuting.
Therefore, this thesis initially considers and critiques a number of relevant behavioural
theories and psychological variables. The first study used semi-structured interviews
along with interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to explore the perception and
attitudes of a group of cycle commuters (n = 8) and potential cycle commuters (n = 7)
based in a workplace that supports cycling. The interest of this study was to identify if
any differences and/or commonalities in social cognitions existed between the two
groups. The findings indicated that potential cyclists are less aware of the range of
benefits associated with cycling to work, and discussed more challenges and fewer
coping strategies than regular and experienced cycle commuters. Whilst the study was
inductive in nature, the findings to emerge suggest that cognitive variables involved in
cycle commuting behaviour (motivations, barriers and coping strategies) could be
aligned with a number of social cognition/ behaviour change theories.
The second and third studies were similar in design and used cross-sectional
questionnaires to investigate perceptions of barriers (Study 2 & 3), perceptions of
benefits (Study 3), self-efficacy (Study 3) and decisional balance scores (Study 3)
related to cycle commuting behaviour. These social cognitions were measured in relation
to stage of change, gender and job role. Both investigations were carried out in workplaces that support cycling. Study 2 (n = 831) highlighted the important role that
perceptions of barriers play in cycle commuting behaviour. Study 3 (n = 337) built on
the previous two studies findings and demonstrated that perceived barriers and benefits
and self-efficacy associated with cycle commuting were all significant predictors of
cycle commuting behaviour, with barriers being the most powerful.
The forth and final study used a pre- and post-test control trial design to evaluate a
psychologically-orientated intervention that was theoretically based on the
Transtheoretical Model of Behaviour. The intervention was designed for people who
were contemplating cycling to work. The small-scale intervention evaluation included
one pre-test and two post-test measures that were collected over a four month period.
The before and after results revealed that the intervention group (n = 17) significantly
decreased their perceptions of barriers and progressed closer to action. This may be
explained by increases in some of the processes of change that were reported. The
control group (n = 16) reported no significant changes in their social cognitions, actions
or in their use of the processes of change. These results suggest that the intervention
designed, developed and trailed in this thesis is successful at encouraging people to cycle
to work.
Together, these four studies demonstrate that social cognitions do play an important role
in cycle commuting behaviour. Throughout this thesis, perceptions of barriers associated
with cycle commuting have shown to play a powerful role in explaining and predicting
behaviour. Whilst barriers can be both perceived (subjective) and actual (objective), the
small-scale intervention study has demonstrated that by psychological intervention alone
perceptions of barriers can be significantly reduced.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/5533
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
cycle commuting
en
dc.subject
psychological
en
dc.subject
workplace
en
dc.subject
qualitative
en
dc.subject
commuting behaviour
en
dc.subject
quantitative
en
dc.title
Understanding and encouraging cycle commuting in workplace setting: a psychological perspective
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- van Bekkum2011.pdf
- Size:
- 18.82 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

