Trust laws of Jersey and Malta: a civilian interpretation
dc.contributor.advisor
Gretton, George
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Carr, Daniel
en
dc.contributor.author
Galea, Patrick Joseph
en
dc.date.accessioned
2018-05-30T10:52:48Z
dc.date.available
2018-05-30T10:52:48Z
dc.date.issued
2016-06-30
dc.description.abstract
This thesis attempts to identify the philosophy, key questions and priorities
behind the trust laws of Jersey and Malta.
By wide accord, the Jersey law has served as a model in many ways to its later
Maltese counterpart. This affinity is placed against the similar background of
either jurisdiction, which embraced, to varying degrees, both the Civil Law
tradition and Common Law influence. The analysis is advanced through the
different moments of the trust, from its creation to termination.
Nevertheless, the underpinning focus and thrust is on the civilian identity of
either trust. It considers whether, and how far, the fundamental Civil Law
concepts and language play a defining role in their civilian configuration. The
question is asked whether the creation of the trust and the duties of a trustee can
possibly be classified as obligational or contractual, or maybe something else.
The nature and character of the beneficiary’s rights are also reviewed.
The overarching role of good faith and civil responsibility, along with their extent
of interaction with traditional Equity fiduciary duties, are weighed, an assessment
naturally following from the civilian flavour attributed to the trusts. The
conceptual overlapping between the Roman-Civil law fiducia, and related figures
such as the mandat prêt-nom, with the Equity fiduciary duties, is assessed. The
role, even if subsidiary, of civilian unjustified enrichment, remains an ever-present
relevant factor. Sham trusts and simulatio, the Pauline fraud and legitim
are considered in the context of the civilian identity of these trusts.
The discussion then engages with the other strand of the thesis, being the role of
the governing law, as the ‘mind’ behind the trust legislations assessed. The
discussion engages with the question whether the trusts fall on the side of respect
for the ‘autonomie de la volonté des parties’ or on other policy determinants
behind the law.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/30995
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
trust laws
en
dc.subject
Jersey
en
dc.subject
Malta
en
dc.subject
Civil Law
en
dc.subject
Common Law
en
dc.subject
civilian identity
en
dc.title
Trust laws of Jersey and Malta: a civilian interpretation
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

